From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] geneve: handle ipv6 priority like ipv4 tos Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:13:39 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1443638045-27229-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <1445353866-32710-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <1445353866-32710-2-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: netdev , Dave Miller , Pravin B Shelar , Jiri Benc To: "John W. Linville" Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:36823 "EHLO mail-lf0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076AbbJUFOB (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 01:14:01 -0400 Received: by lffz202 with SMTP id z202so15583381lff.3 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:13:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1445353866-32710-2-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:11 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > Other callers of udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb just pass 0 for the prio > argument. Jesse Gross suggested that prio is really > the same as IPv4's tos and should be handled the same, so this is my > interpretation of that suggestion. > > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville > Reported-by: Jesse Gross Reviewed-by: Jesse Gross