From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA78BC43613 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 17:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E0D208C3 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 17:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="wCehu0cC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726145AbfFURMF (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:12:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:55096 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726017AbfFURMF (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:12:05 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g135so6972467wme.4 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:12:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wxr2lSdUhJgiTc5D2qMkfm5yMBvV0zsum9CKhKZLKz4=; b=wCehu0cCKZdI0SqRemOcP+Jn913NqS5nSwotxkFEFo5+dPmAtz98iMU2wgRqCjFI/e mfJHcD6e3Xprhrb6TswjZuQ5BO33gux+9KU3rr2Lp4nxHKiQtODWN60aOqc8Bgj3TIh/ tqfZHDPiQdwUZ7SkWBB+PP9i0DtUcFWK2kJF8kR7sqguXYAmNzuLpV/HoLY9VKKsxDs5 0uNZj/It2Gjca0mOMdmL2lqX0vPV3cCPE9R0kOgEgVL6I4ZJclhj2GCJWjpvZUhK4U4a hOAIQflzgT+NnohAEOQQq4eM/KzhCa070OPFMc0pWwBhITwIWUxa01b+9KCgXcQGO2w4 fNnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wxr2lSdUhJgiTc5D2qMkfm5yMBvV0zsum9CKhKZLKz4=; b=N9Nfpa/7QxJi8pPeU1Tes55at5u2zHdiNoXmVfUTZ2noB8P0g8GfXsOhLnRHtBJoJr yQrPMm5hwezDZuweQxAKv13Pp8POjwWzpBgP0EJtlIfNe4HcxKLo3cry+kUIAGRMjZQQ 78zL+elFChyfUHkYbIuIcpPuJVFVZvV1WJWFl7MIvOBeSWo50JGIs3lNKgIOIHMIX018 bwiGpYmU4MgDoMms8wsVaecLJLc+SZrKm9V6TV7Vmo+8ci1zU/XOnN1+5ww4+Ni9ypk0 Rdyx2MAV35PEDzFWOWGViXDUq/G2BmWTr26/OTUyyG7SzRsH/hGS042vQgy8TWyQjXBW zeOw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVoyaBuux5hFxYOhFF0cE3U+e4dx8cpQz39QQUhhZAUplI2rcw5 L3mmdJ6cB/+yIyo3mqRzZPiWnS0syzmWT6L6s+DH X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywL6fNwbUpFL//brGYmRCCnNuSg/TYeHcfUUEF0hSGIlVkbA14J2PQH52TmeF3M+qF5tLucTRd8fAuLAIi+2E= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9ecd:: with SMTP id h196mr5008540wme.98.1561137124525; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190621163921.26188-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190621163921.26188-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:11:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: ethernet: atheros: atlx: Use PCI generic definitions instead of private duplicates To: Puranjay Mohan Cc: Shuah Khan , Bjorn Helgaas , netdev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Linux PCI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 11:39 AM Puranjay Mohan wrote: > > This patch series removes the private duplicates of PCI definitions in > favour of generic definitions defined in pci_regs.h. > > Puranjay Mohan (3): > net: ethernet: atheros: atlx: Rename local PCI defines to generic > names > net: ethernet: atheros: atlx: Include generic PCI definitions > net: ethernet: atheros: atlx: Remove unused and private PCI > definitions > > drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atl2.c | 5 +++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atl2.h | 2 -- > drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atlx/atlx.h | 1 - > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Let's slow this down a little bit; I'm afraid we're going to overwhelm folks. Before posting more to LKML/netdev, how about we first complete a sweep of all the drivers to see what we're getting into. It could be that this will end up being more churn than it's worth. You could send the result to linux-kernel-mentees, Shuah, me (but not LKML and netdev), and then we can talk about whether it should be posted all at once, as several series, etc.