From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Souptick Joarder Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: consolidate kmalloc + memset 0 into kzalloc Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:36:43 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1450716464-20759-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Kalle Valo , Eliad Peller , Johannes Berg , Arik Nemtsov , Tony Lindgren , Luciano Coelho , Eyal Reizer , Emmanuel Grumbach , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Nicholas Mc Guire Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1450716464-20759-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > This is an API consolidation only. The use of kmalloc + memset to 0 > is equivalent to kzalloc. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire > --- > > Found by coccinelle script (relaxed version of > scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/kzalloc-simple.cocci) > > Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + > CONFIG_WL12XX=m (implies CONFIG_WLCORE=m) > > Patch is against linux-next (localversion-next is -next-20151221) > > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c > index ec7f6af..dfc49bf 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c > @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void wl12xx_read_fwlog_panic(struct wl1271 *wl) > > wl1271_info("Reading FW panic log"); > > - block = kmalloc(wl->fw_mem_block_size, GFP_KERNEL); > + block = kzalloc(wl->fw_mem_block_size, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!block) > return; > > @@ -885,7 +885,6 @@ static void wl12xx_read_fwlog_panic(struct wl1271 *wl) > goto out; > } > > - memset(block, 0, wl->fw_mem_block_size); Current code is reseting the block value to 0 in each iterations and perform some operations. But if you are using kzalloc as mentioned above it will memset 0 to block pointer only once. So both are not equivalent operations. > ret = wlcore_read_hwaddr(wl, addr, block, > wl->fw_mem_block_size, false); > > -- > 2.1.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -Souptick