From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B948C4741F for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E072221924 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="DjI4928c" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730602AbgI2N4B (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:56:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727328AbgI2N4A (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:56:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com (mail-pg1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C648C061755; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id 7so3929870pgm.11; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:56:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8cnOjlXg8/acRqjzJZ6Vpsc0wsLmh58ThBWZMSvOp7E=; b=DjI4928c6xr+7SC2mBQQiNnqNYZ6GlUnBuLnBcXMYvZgRU2V8uE04jLGPx4cAXa69m m5JX7psHW1a3V/udvX7xyCfPAhv/aOnWusvOyJl3wouE3oWYYBWcoP+updV83cc+EkPF o3i0NpUslv/6y68XpfFiY25H69FKN8rpOxM3fN65U8c3LB04AJ31MXwa9BNAu1W3pnsV 0QtduGOdNspKtUdYWu6+0R/+mtYWcjTlI20Yz3QwZHsqgjgytJ1U2a+1qo/umKh8MW9B DbB7O3/EZlD161Bb5iFQjE8zxwVv/XcQSw2/buJUIPbumpEvmFTe+fj2bbMzfWmrxZV3 rUPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8cnOjlXg8/acRqjzJZ6Vpsc0wsLmh58ThBWZMSvOp7E=; b=pg4Wjpd+FsO499wTvsUaxPWbCQ0a/niKzWeApOoUD2lCZizxx4cVoakagcm6CDJ8AG VxE3mWYl2ZK3rLNJyDDoVafJ8R9Zp+mey1AxnWEBcswZcOkTvYssu9qPyDl6OS1Ga/+H 7ZX7AWZNCxTLv5n9lSO2V5Mcr+8bpU/Oe9gGAIG+iu6h8BzTSIHuZJIudtJP6AUynoMc /bYrB7QSQfIaZeFmPmdWGHTL4w6oNWUAdg+qOv02RnADHyI78wlFly179C8jfH9QdNxg xG/PsC1wjSsio/CJeC8p94xI/RZBy/9DPbGD/BYKBaI9EkQFGGwnGdNwyVjfB6V1n5ww eVug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mXsI9dZGMLwJ18UKsOK0K1MM20CH2VYmJrGZcm8eP2OsYOSfc bJVIRr6vLvbVV1nxresZHdpL278K0j3AKqZ5Pv8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQdYATfk8pYpnnHB7BmWkVCg3LXvB/+2axN4vn+pVt5bSBSAIbOvd476+VwMN4itBdj501sOYJrosKDjtKtQ4= X-Received: by 2002:a63:d648:: with SMTP id d8mr3355331pgj.4.1601387760091; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:56:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <20200715090400.4733-2-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <20200929051703.GA10849@lsv03152.swis.in-blr01.nxp.com> <20200929134302.GF3950513@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <20200929134302.GF3950513@lunn.ch> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:55:40 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Calvin Johnson , Grant Likely , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Jeremy Linton , Russell King - ARM Linux admin , Jon , Cristi Sovaiala , Ioana Ciornei , Florian Fainelli , Madalin Bucur , netdev , "linux.cj" , ACPI Devel Maling List , nd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:43 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:47:03AM +0530, Calvin Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 02:34:21PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: ... > Newbie ACPI question: Does ACPI even support big endian CPUs, given > its x86 origins? I understand the newbie part, but can you elaborate what did you mean under 'support'? To me it sounds like 'network stack was developed for BE CPUs, does it support LE ones?' -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko