From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D38C433E1 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2672206F6 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="frk+u3/Z" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727116AbgGXUMc (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:12:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44632 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726573AbgGXUMb (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:12:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB052C0619D3; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id t6so5998881pgq.1; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:12:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EjQZfJPvrEhOrgi5StMMr7gYrhKuKg6ktfwJiCk7lLY=; b=frk+u3/ZKFyP46C3xYdGaqUBLIHK3it67RtUUx66M41w0hRUsoIufyKmumEE83df8r 2Cmk/cd/BQ64rvqWOO6iBC/NJV0c1fcUTq2dwrjDOcovdeUOIWtOx0cNpBYOYJinT6TP +ZZF5jnPYWJcd0s8L2dBvAeKwDzltirTRk1Y6q/1mIdMXbMV5FFkSAu2fNtgUUWZm5gv eSCiYJEMPLCFIz7adD1lxFnbXizvuEbYhA/7b15do5RkBzgoEbBJLk3eZthmXgUEl+gm BaYc9314/ueQ/yPSIBlSqaVgEg7WHNl19eAKXup8NmnAq3Eq6LcDq4YT3TvVmFKIBoSX B4fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EjQZfJPvrEhOrgi5StMMr7gYrhKuKg6ktfwJiCk7lLY=; b=pYeY7Qsl71fv1auFnrv6OmbFLrYI5XN391IjttZPBvAOhwBRAZG8MXLI3h9ME6ywqo ML53ISiwQmvXK/dapMxy+66scvodN+93s3O1NyJsLCWD1AbsDUwdYsp9Bsdsdah+/+3t Zzm49Db5Aoq6FDX94rMbQbblCYoyLniXZCU+lC1MkO1SGA+WVV2PjWyfac+8CIBzw/Kc e2u8H4uNrmK+ucALCAYwjSS/hHB5nEhHjEtVH7axX9sQemX8sHIvUFXO4F7i6Yi0EuAq U1CycuiAssUGmlCb/4qV4oL8M1LCvght4xoYBQCnqyJ+lqM2ocY/0Z+HalOdWM6kgjdn /mow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533t0yppiZaAhdmvIQz9hGnPKaXzhAFG0AVNCpGEVsYqB0a8yDcg 8qDdQREBEVjEXjPY4I2vsMNlHLytuxgasD5tph7/JXth X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJAAxB5seehmqilD3u7UYLaPX4caecXVXLy4YwHyMz3rDJCNB31NqTIRMm+dZX+wb9adiTP+HtlVjAZfthANY= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8bcb:: with SMTP id s11mr10096246pfd.170.1595621551288; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:12:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <20200715090400.4733-2-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <1a031e62-1e87-fdc1-b672-e3ccf3530fda@arm.com> <20200724133931.GF1472201@lunn.ch> <97973095-5458-8ac2-890c-667f4ea6cd0e@arm.com> <20200724192008.GI1594328@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <20200724192008.GI1594328@lunn.ch> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:12:15 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Florian Fainelli , Jeremy Linton , Calvin Johnson , Russell King - ARM Linux admin , Jon , Cristi Sovaiala , Ioana Ciornei , Madalin Bucur , netdev , linux.cj@gmail.com, ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:20 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: > I think we need to NACK all attempts to add ACPI support to phylib and > phylink until an authoritative ACPI Linux maintainer makes an > appearance and actively steers the work. And not just this patchset, > but all patchsets in the networking domain which have an ACPI > component. It's funny, since I see ACPI mailing list and none of the maintainers in the Cc here... I'm not sure they pay attention to some (noise-like?) activity which (from their perspective) happens on unrelated lists. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko