From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: Fixes to remote checksum offload and CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:04:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMg112cOhwfBS1PX84J7XvOEukNXqGDP5w5H8oZS0EKDfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423614633-25042-1-git-send-email-therbert@google.com>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> wrote:
> This patch set fixes a correctness problem with remote checksum
> offload, clarifies the meaning of CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, and allows
> remote checksum offload to set CHECKSUM_PARTIAL instead of
> calling csum_partial and modifying the checksum.
Hi Tom,
Does this series change elements in the RCO basic architecture as you
described it in your LKS [1] slides and/or the IETF draft [2]?
Or.
[1] http://vger.kernel.org/encapsulation_offloads.pdf
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbert-remotecsumoffload-01
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-11 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-11 0:30 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: Fixes to remote checksum offload and CHECKSUM_PARTIAL Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: Fix remcsum in GRO path to not change packet Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: Clarify meaning of CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for receive path Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] udp: Set SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL* in UDP GRO path Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: Use more bit fields in napi_gro_cb Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: Infrastructure for CHECKSUM_PARTIAL with remote checsum offload Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] vxlan: Use checksum partial with remote checksum offload Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] gue: " Tom Herbert
2015-02-11 4:04 ` Or Gerlitz [this message]
2015-02-11 23:18 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: Fixes to remote checksum offload and CHECKSUM_PARTIAL David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJ3xEMg112cOhwfBS1PX84J7XvOEukNXqGDP5w5H8oZS0EKDfA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gerlitz.or@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).