From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PM: runtime: Add a general runtime get sync operation to deal with usage counter
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:53:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gZo=kvWWSOTzNaYohr1Yk0iiZnj3+WZbq+jK3HXLu16g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFr-XCAWKQiN29s-=XusqqPSqumK9wZVePT+5C7J43BKqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:50 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 16:20, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:00 PM Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In many case, we need to check return value of pm_runtime_get_sync, but
> > > it brings a trouble to the usage counter processing. Many callers forget
> > > to decrease the usage counter when it failed. It has been discussed a
> > > lot[0][1]. So we add a function to deal with the usage counter for better
> > > coding.
> > >
> > > [0]https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/14/88
> > > [1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/20200520095148.10995-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn/
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> > > index 4b708f4e8eed..6549ce764400 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> > > @@ -386,6 +386,36 @@ static inline int pm_runtime_get_sync(struct device *dev)
> > > return __pm_runtime_resume(dev, RPM_GET_PUT);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * pm_runtime_general_get - Bump up usage counter of a device and resume it.
> > > + * @dev: Target device.
> > > + *
> > > + * Increase runtime PM usage counter of @dev first, and carry out runtime-resume
> > > + * of it synchronously. If __pm_runtime_resume return negative value(device is in
> > > + * error state), we to need decrease the usage counter before it return. If
> > > + * __pm_runtime_resume return positive value, it means the runtime of device has
> > > + * already been in active state, and we let the new wrapper return zero instead.
> > > + *
> > > + * The possible return values of this function is zero or negative value.
> > > + * zero:
> > > + * - it means resume succeeed or runtime of device has already been active, the
> > > + * runtime PM usage counter of @dev remains incremented.
> > > + * negative:
> > > + * - it means failure and the runtime PM usage counter of @dev has been balanced.
> >
> > The kerneldoc above is kind of noisy and it is hard to figure out what
> > the helper really does from it.
> >
> > You could basically say something like "Resume @dev synchronously and
> > if that is successful, increment its runtime PM usage counter. Return
> > 0 if the runtime PM usage counter of @dev has been incremented or a
> > negative error code otherwise."
> >
> > > + */
> > > +static inline int pm_runtime_general_get(struct device *dev)
> >
> > What about pm_runtime_resume_and_get()?
>
> We already have pm_runtime_get_if_active() - so perhaps
> pm_runtime_get_if_suspended() could be an option as well?
It doesn't work this way, though.
The "get" happens even if the device has not been suspended.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-09 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 15:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix usage counter leak by adding a general sync ops Zhang Qilong
2020-11-09 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PM: runtime: Add a general runtime get sync operation to deal with usage counter Zhang Qilong
2020-11-09 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-09 15:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-11-09 15:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-11-09 16:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-11-09 15:50 ` 答复: " zhangqilong
2020-11-09 16:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-09 16:15 ` 答复: " zhangqilong
2020-11-09 16:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-09 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: fec: Fix reference count leak in fec series ops Zhang Qilong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0gZo=kvWWSOTzNaYohr1Yk0iiZnj3+WZbq+jK3HXLu16g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fugang.duan@nxp.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=zhangqilong3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).