From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 1/3] net: add ndo to get id of physical port of the device Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:37:25 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1374498317-6442-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <1374498317-6442-2-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <20130722180141.GA1498@minipsycho.orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, stephen@networkplumber.org, Narendra_K@dell.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:33696 "EHLO mail-qa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932629Ab3GVSh0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:37:26 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bq6so985944qab.4 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:37:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130722180141.GA1498@minipsycho.orion> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > I have almost done implementation for igb/igbvf (consulting with Intel > guys) and I'm working on bnx2x NPAR as well (consulting with Broadcom). I > will post these patches soon. good, I would prefer to have at least one driver patch as part of the initial series, as typically done when adding e.g new ndo entry, makes sense? Or.