netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] tcp: consolidate SYNACK RTT sampling
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:54:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=eO7Ktx0J+4QChiy09dJyoWdrL6+g53_d8+i-QCM9PynA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130722.180255.685921996264320731.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:02 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:20:45 -0700
>
>> This patch series improve RTT sampling in three ways:
>> 1. Sample RTT during fast recovery and reordering events.
>> 2. Favor ack-based RTT to timestamps because of broken TS ECR fields
>> 3. Consolidate the RTT measurement logic.
>>
>> The first patch consolidates SYNACK and other RTT measurement to use a
>> central function tcp_ack_update_rtt(). A (small) bonus is now SYNACK
>> RTT measurement happens after PAWS check, potentially reducing the
>> impact of RTO seeding on bad TCP timestamps values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
>
> I like this series a lot, applied, thanks!
>
> Next time please submit a seperate "[PATCH 0/4] xxx" posting.
>
> If it has non-trivial content, I use the "0" posting as the
> commit message of a merge commit when I apply your series.
>
> What I did here was take the text:
>
> ====================
> This patch series improve RTT sampling in three ways:
> 1. Sample RTT during fast recovery and reordering events.
> 2. Favor ack-based RTT to timestamps because of broken TS ECR fields
> 3. Consolidate the RTT measurement logic.
> ====================
>
> and place it into that merge commit, removing it from the patch #1
> commit message.
Thank you David. Sorry for the extra hassle. Will definitely do that
for next patch series.

>
> Thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-23 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-22 23:20 Yuchung Cheng
2013-07-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] tcp: prefer packet timing to TS-ECR for RTT Yuchung Cheng
2013-07-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/4] tcp: measure RTT from new SACK Yuchung Cheng
2013-07-22 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] tcp: use RTT from SACK for RTO Yuchung Cheng
2013-07-23  1:02 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] tcp: consolidate SYNACK RTT sampling David Miller
2013-07-23 15:54   ` Yuchung Cheng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK6E8=eO7Ktx0J+4QChiy09dJyoWdrL6+g53_d8+i-QCM9PynA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ycheng@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=nanditad@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] tcp: consolidate SYNACK RTT sampling' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).