netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: "Zefan Li" <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Network Developers" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Cameron Berkenpas" <cam@neo-zeon.de>,
	"Peter Geis" <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
	"Lu Fengqi" <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Daniël Sonck" <dsonck92@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] cgroup: fix cgroup_sk_alloc() for sk_clone_lock()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 20:00:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUmajKqeYW9uwtEiFeZGz=q7DFYQT5sq_27yaqoudewuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200620011409.GG237539@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:14 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 09:00:40AM +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
> > I think so, though I'm not familiar with the bfp cgroup code.
> >
> > > If so, we might wanna fix it in a different way,
> > > just checking if (!(css->flags & CSS_NO_REF)) in cgroup_bpf_put()
> > > like in cgroup_put(). It feels more reliable to me.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah I also have this idea in my mind.
>
> I wonder if the following patch will fix the issue?

Interesting, AFAIU, this refcnt is for bpf programs attached
to the cgroup. By this suggestion, do you mean the root
cgroup does not need to refcnt the bpf programs attached
to it? This seems odd, as I don't see how root is different
from others in terms of bpf programs which can be attached
and detached in the same way.

I certainly understand the root cgroup is never gone, but this
does not mean the bpf programs attached to it too.

What am I missing?

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-20  3:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16 18:03 [Patch net] cgroup: fix cgroup_sk_alloc() for sk_clone_lock() Cong Wang
2020-06-18  1:44 ` Zefan Li
2020-06-18 19:19   ` Cong Wang
2020-06-18 19:36     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-18 21:09       ` Cong Wang
2020-06-18 21:26         ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-18 22:45           ` Peter Geis
2020-06-19  6:40         ` Zefan Li
2020-06-19 19:51           ` Cong Wang
2020-06-20  0:45             ` Zefan Li
2020-06-20  0:51               ` Zefan Li
2020-06-20  3:31                 ` Cong Wang
2020-06-20  7:52                   ` Zefan Li
2020-06-20 16:04                     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-23 22:21                   ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-26  5:23                     ` Cameron Berkenpas
2020-06-26 17:58                       ` Cong Wang
2020-06-26 22:03                         ` Cameron Berkenpas
2020-06-27 22:59                           ` Cameron Berkenpas
2020-06-30 22:16                             ` Cong Wang
2020-06-27 23:41                         ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-30 22:22                           ` Cong Wang
2020-06-30 22:48                             ` Roman Gushchin
2020-07-01  1:18                               ` Zefan Li
2020-07-02  4:48                               ` Cong Wang
2020-07-02  8:12                                 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-07-02 16:02                                 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-07-02 16:24                                   ` Peter Geis
2020-07-03  1:17                                   ` Zefan Li
2020-06-20  0:51           ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-20  1:00             ` Zefan Li
2020-06-20  1:14               ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-20  2:48                 ` Zefan Li
2020-06-20  3:00                 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2020-06-20 15:57                   ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-22 18:14                     ` Cong Wang
2020-06-22 20:39                       ` Roman Gushchin
2020-06-23  8:45                         ` Zhang,Qiang
2020-06-23 17:56                           ` Cong Wang
2020-06-23  8:54                         ` Zhang,Qiang
2020-06-23  9:01                         ` Zhang,Qiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM_iQpUmajKqeYW9uwtEiFeZGz=q7DFYQT5sq_27yaqoudewuQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=cam@neo-zeon.de \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dsonck92@gmail.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).