From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: vxlan: do not use vxlan_net before checking event type Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:50:49 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1389959706-30976-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <52D97746.1040408@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: David Miller , Linux Kernel Network Developers , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jesse Brandeburg To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]:59131 "EHLO mail-oa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752041AbaARDut (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:50:49 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o6so5503783oag.41 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:50:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52D97746.1040408@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > > If you want to do cleanups, whatever, I really don't care. > You had your chance to complain about that when you reviewed > the initial version ... it has nothing to do with the fix. This is not for stable, as long as it doesn't harm the readability we are free to do any cleanup's. If unsure, check Eric's patch for tunnel dst cache. BTW, I am the original author of the patch, you just updated it *trivially* and set yourself as the author. :) I don't mind, but remember that this may be not appropriate for others. At very least I didn't and don't do this myself.