From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57628C433DF for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8DA20722 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 04:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GTJ/2+ZL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725904AbgE3Esi (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2020 00:48:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33278 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725813AbgE3Esh (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2020 00:48:37 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd41.google.com (mail-io1-xd41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3548C08C5C9 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 21:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd41.google.com with SMTP id d5so1556164ios.9 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 21:48:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xKceH09btGsJ70pI0cRAGgEBPwDnokf/z23gG8sTaoE=; b=GTJ/2+ZL09L4lcFK4xib8VU3DCzPt9gs9z5iUoTpb5mjJkl+BwZo86351eIb5QPfhn dxBvbOsEj2iBlyPECkrvIu1t4qcTAFH8S8YQmW0JRjmhCFETRRDBq8B2fHni2NDKClIa r/IHNzUfZ+YOfVKVmCQMej4xpn/al3CvbTYysCPBNHr/Aax+5zbhgvgi5HQdwwm5KfmO QhMqpaH5WSMtox/RLtAM42uz6dy8ARelWFJ0OkaB/itD9SaPjSSyt6bDpvHIt4mfVTH+ usvU5d6EVO1qlrX1NSE8OdttmmC/ALV5iI+Nu8U7AC49LbSIbXpX7gD15xePJtl7RjVR cAuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xKceH09btGsJ70pI0cRAGgEBPwDnokf/z23gG8sTaoE=; b=TcNxqAkHjP+88zabRSO3dhuzL7Cq+fb+N1vjNeMTHOzTvQT/iHD0Ue12l+oiHhjry4 XKAbikq99iKWsm3KZXuD+hnS/g8n5qaqHpvXXdsyRTJIY6VRhnVBkoR86QFfvYRL2W9P C0FF8mJQr16yaDIJH7tYUVw3t4YmqZsxSvPhOBK321J1b3128YnWCo13MchOfgqB9WVe we0F8hup3byRGBHctamPdIXfa9JCZmLmonUSkZ715pYy3ecKoXyiDuZIq8Iuiprio1LS b7UMh27I9vCBDme0ORxCdjLA6uSNVYqnTB0oj554uUJ+PO3EoKbX9O9Wv5SiV1KS5RdE Iqvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DXochpEg8UAIyV54QR7qBn0dD8AKLCO9Q32fRQXLBr/R7eIfm oMDyzMNwqiqB6lpCvBMYu5fCZ8b7KK2p9q8mV2Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGLzFoG4iQulwFRB1IRBl/xHsS0E7krQza803EztjOM687EE1h8hQu8qjWL6EkoJCgZgKWP78qElUBeJT2qrA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2a52:: with SMTP id k18mr9622081iov.64.1590814116971; Fri, 29 May 2020 21:48:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <877dwxvgzk.fsf@mellanox.com> <87wo4wtmnx.fsf@mellanox.com> In-Reply-To: <87wo4wtmnx.fsf@mellanox.com> From: Cong Wang Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 21:48:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] TC: Introduce qevents To: Petr Machata Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:48 AM Petr Machata wrote: > So you propose to have further division within the block? To have sort > of namespaces within blocks or chains, where depending on the context, > only filters in the corresponding namespace are executed? What I suggest is to let filters (or chain or block) decide where they belong to, because I think that fit naturally. What you suggest is to let qdisc's decide where they put filters, which looks odd to me. Hope it is all clear now. Thanks.