netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Akshat Kakkar <akshat.1984@gmail.com>
Cc: Anton Danilov <littlesmilingcloud@gmail.com>,
	NetFilter <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lartc <lartc@vger.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to create htb tc classes more than 64K
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 10:52:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVtGUH6CAAegRtTgyemLtHsO+RFP8f6LH2WtiYu9-srfw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA5aLPjO9rucCLJnmQiPBxw2pJ=6okf3C88rH9GWnh3p0R+Rmw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:00 PM Akshat Kakkar <akshat.1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 3:37 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am using ipset +  iptables to classify and not filters. Besides, if
> > > tc is allowing me to define qdisc -> classes -> qdsic -> classes
> > > (1,2,3 ...) sort of structure (ie like the one shown in ascii tree)
> > > then how can those lowest child classes be actually used or consumed?
> >
> > Just install tc filters on the lower level too.
>
> If I understand correctly, you are saying,
> instead of :
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle
> 0x00000001 fw flowid 1:10
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle
> 0x00000002 fw flowid 1:20
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle
> 0x00000003 fw flowid 2:10
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 100: protocol ip prio 1 handle
> 0x00000004 fw flowid 2:20
>
>
> I should do this: (i.e. changing parent to just immediate qdisc)
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000001
> fw flowid 1:10
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000002
> fw flowid 1:20
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 2: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000003
> fw flowid 2:10
> tc filter add dev eno2 parent 2: protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x00000004
> fw flowid 2:20


Yes, this is what I meant.


>
> I tried this previously. But there is not change in the result.
> Behaviour is exactly same, i.e. I am still getting 100Mbps and not
> 100kbps or 300kbps
>
> Besides, as I mentioned previously I am using ipset + skbprio and not
> filters stuff. Filters I used just to test.
>
> ipset  -N foo hash:ip,mark skbinfo
>
> ipset -A foo 10.10.10.10, 0x0x00000001 skbprio 1:10
> ipset -A foo 10.10.10.20, 0x0x00000002 skbprio 1:20
> ipset -A foo 10.10.10.30, 0x0x00000003 skbprio 2:10
> ipset -A foo 10.10.10.40, 0x0x00000004 skbprio 2:20
>
> iptables -A POSTROUTING -j SET --map-set foo dst,dst --map-prio

Hmm..

I am not familiar with ipset, but it seems to save the skbprio into
skb->priority, so it doesn't need TC filter to classify it again.

I guess your packets might go to the direct queue of HTB, which
bypasses the token bucket. Can you dump the stats and check?

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-25 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-16 12:48 Unable to create htb tc classes more than 64K Akshat Kakkar
2019-08-16 17:45 ` Cong Wang
2019-08-17 12:46   ` Akshat Kakkar
2019-08-17 18:24     ` Cong Wang
2019-08-17 19:04       ` Akshat Kakkar
2019-08-20  6:26         ` Akshat Kakkar
2019-08-21 22:06         ` Cong Wang
2019-08-22  5:59           ` Akshat Kakkar
2019-08-25 17:52             ` Cong Wang [this message]
2019-08-26  6:32               ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-26  7:28                 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-08-27 20:53                 ` Dave Taht
2019-08-27 21:09                   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-27 21:41                     ` Dave Taht
2020-01-10 12:38                 ` Akshat Kakkar
2019-08-26 16:45         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAM_iQpVtGUH6CAAegRtTgyemLtHsO+RFP8f6LH2WtiYu9-srfw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=akshat.1984@gmail.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=littlesmilingcloud@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).