From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A44DC10DCE for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B6C2076C for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=flowbird.group header.i=@flowbird.group header.b="YQZyAox1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727533AbgCRI2M (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 04:28:12 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:44551 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726733AbgCRI2H (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 04:28:07 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id w4so11267308lji.11 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 01:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=flowbird.group; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UzaS2e/XdZpUtzF616elOdAAPbhPZrej3K/evwYVIEM=; b=YQZyAox1qVRZw1QkCUb5HF0ehx5/zSENEbTNgYqxSu1U53i4/8ykPHc6HyuvRUwx3K +qQBIuTSJn4LSj961MijUmv/I2qY+6T9RY4d8B9y/Gj+99CZsl77yNfmLqrIxnvY0n4L q9TyitjevfqJwFXqgMCfn6f5wJgIejbXI1Qld3MnMvE2vo/d/SglXm69FyeUVFF4GPmc 55G9BwXgaIVYYZaoENAbP2ljhHQfAx1Sla0cy5Qkq4TblJT4fLMcLqsOCgX8e4NS360h TwgtvR6t5qwKd9egoLLlFa1JiAHUuv1Gdz0m+eT4b+QWi51tyQU+xozKaMvIVOi4Bvu0 lrAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UzaS2e/XdZpUtzF616elOdAAPbhPZrej3K/evwYVIEM=; b=PKcMGM2YONyT7mZYVVT4CZ1X9774/be3TnlqWWlmKh4ch+BQ3Y3Y4NsA36IGVWR81T NDqJz0HeUfMYHTCgmogjjfqdls3FVC1b2dBGfnYdRVZ5STqmlQ72NYfJGSrapz+vD72R k0nu3IncsadH40/K92hK/j+xKARRhQQzP4s1AkA3mUy8YIS2rimawE9nNjFj4Dh2oOvB hOyBsDpGWvhZGf5wbbq9AXDvmTTfLkee1MhTZDfKAzdMyABZvASnzh51+b7C4WqZcm7c jatufjDKgvXQFitkfWoh5L1tdAYKjuk4syZPwkWJR/0D6qTiHWmet5orER9L+3n//5pJ ZesA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1UoCICGQGBRqkooI5TZDBdbnJ59V+E4+RRfNr5HTxd8j3O3BXq w3MTqwMsvpTRWZVDHhkhSVwjsgDfZmaogW6ffZidtg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vstaPio4DgQjZBcZ6ke0vdqic5ns/5uMmDF4KiVhTeFUCGYD6+i5x/xuLKooeFxPoxk6UpLTOxWif0VXPGmoqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2007:: with SMTP id s7mr1764988ljo.214.1584520084172; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 01:28:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1584463806-15788-1-git-send-email-martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group> In-Reply-To: From: "Fuzzey, Martin" Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:27:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH 0/4] Fix Wake on lan with FEC on i.MX6 To: Andy Duan Cc: Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , "David S. Miller" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Fabio Estevam , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sascha Hauer , dl-linux-imx , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy, On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 07:28, Andy Duan wrote: > > > The most of code is reused from nxp internal tree, > If you refer the patches from nxp kernel tree, please > keep the signed-off with original author. > Ok, looks like it was originally from you, should I add your current email address or the one at the time (B38611@freescale.com)? Actually I don't have the NXP tree but a Digi tree, which is probably based on it. I think, generally, this is a bit of a grey area. While I would always keep a SoB if I base a patch on an old mailing list patch submission (and contact the person if possible first to ask) I'm not sure if a SoB from a "random git tree" indicates they wish a mainline submission with their name (some people may want credit and others not want to be considered responsible for bugs...). I didn't see a submission of this version (with the gpr information coming from the DT) on the mailing lists, only the initial version using the platform callback that was NAKd (I may have missed it though). Regards, Martin