From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:28:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPBZ5QcpooNi=YnGJJxM020LO=Z_GAM_teGiE5gLKX-g9xhcHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181023.202921.1185045750138652543.davem@davemloft.net>
 <CAHk-=whuhCGujWKO8JObGQaSdWOpJBXdkM-B-vD80QZifveScw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wh2H9jE2RXibQgWs3_Q539roj62_gzPXKjnhhKqSFcw2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lg6nu6k1.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87h8hbu5uy.fsf@qca.qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        govinds@codeaurora.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
        Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>
To: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87h8hbu5uy.fsf@qca.qualcomm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Sorry for spam, I am resending in cleartext because the previous
missed the lists.  Thanks Google for resetting my config when you
'upgraded'.

On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 09:05, Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
>
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:01 AM Linus Torvalds
> >> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hmm. Tentatively pulled, but there's something wrong with the Kconfig rules.
> >>
> >> Confirmed.
> >
> > BTW, our emails crossed and more info in the other email[1].
> >
> >> I did a978a5b8d83f ("net/kconfig: Make QCOM_QMI_HELPERS available when
> >> COMPILE_TEST") to fix the breakage.
> >
> > Thanks, though I don't see it yet as I guess you haven't pushed it yet.
> > Do note that it _might_ conflict the other commit which I suspect is in
> > also coming to you:
> >
> > ccfb464cd106 ("soc: qcom: Allow COMPILE_TEST of qcom SoC Kconfigs")
>
> git.kernel.org is alive again for me so I can now check both commits. It
> seems that Niklas' commit[1] is more finegrained than what Linus did[2].
> I guess either of the commits should be reverted when Niklas' commit
> goes to Linus tree, or what's the best course of action?

Yes this will conflict with Niklas's patch which is part of the 4.20
pull requests.  I would prefer that we revert Linus's and take
Niklas's unless there is a compelling argument to have it fixed before
-rc1.  That said, if you didn't, the merge conflicts would be minor
and easily handled.

Regards,
Andy Gross