netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
To: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stsp2@yandex.ru" <stsp2@yandex.ru>,
	"oxffffaa@gmail.com" <oxffffaa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 02/19] af_vsock: separate wait data loop
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:24:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E5526501-3A87-4349-8D7F-61782AA1F513@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210218053637.1066959-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>


> On 18 Feb 2021, at 06:36, Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> wrote:
> 
> This moves wait loop for data to dedicated function, because later
> it will be used by SEQPACKET data receive loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index 656370e11707..6cf7bb977aa1 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -1832,6 +1832,68 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 	return err;
> }
> 
> +static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait,
> +			   long timeout,
> +			   struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data *recv_data,
> +			   size_t target)
> +{
> +	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
> +	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> +	s64 data;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> +	err = 0;
> +	transport = vsk->transport;
> +	prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +
> +	while ((data = vsock_stream_has_data(vsk)) == 0) {

In the original code, the prepare_to_wait() is called for each iteration of the while loop. In this
version, it is only called once. So if we do multiple iterations, the thread would be in the
TASK_RUNNING state, and subsequent schedule_timeout() will return immediately. So
looks like the prepare_to_wait() should be move here, in case we have a spurious wake_up.

> +		if (sk->sk_err != 0 ||
> +		    (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
> +		    (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)) {
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
> +		if (timeout == 0) {
> +			err = -EAGAIN;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (recv_data) {
> +			err = transport->notify_recv_pre_block(vsk, target, recv_data);
> +			if (err < 0)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		release_sock(sk);
> +		timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> +		lock_sock(sk);
> +
> +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
> +			break;
> +		} else if (timeout == 0) {
> +			err = -EAGAIN;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), wait);
> +
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	/* Internal transport error when checking for available
> +	 * data. XXX This should be changed to a connection
> +	 * reset in a later change.
> +	 */
> +	if (data < 0)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	return data;
> +}
> +
> static int
> vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> 			  int flags)
> @@ -1911,85 +1973,34 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> 
> 
> 	while (1) {
> -		s64 ready;
> -
> -		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -		ready = vsock_stream_has_data(vsk);
> -
> -		if (ready == 0) {
> -			if (sk->sk_err != 0 ||
> -			    (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
> -			    (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)) {
> -				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -			/* Don't wait for non-blocking sockets. */
> -			if (timeout == 0) {
> -				err = -EAGAIN;
> -				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> -				break;
> -			}
> +		ssize_t read;
> 
> -			err = transport->notify_recv_pre_block(
> -					vsk, target, &recv_data);
> -			if (err < 0) {
> -				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -			release_sock(sk);
> -			timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> -			lock_sock(sk);
> +		err = vsock_wait_data(sk, &wait, timeout, &recv_data, target);
> +		if (err <= 0)
> +			break;
> 
> -			if (signal_pending(current)) {
> -				err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
> -				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> -				break;
> -			} else if (timeout == 0) {
> -				err = -EAGAIN;
> -				finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		} else {
> -			ssize_t read;
> -
> -			finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> -
> -			if (ready < 0) {
> -				/* Invalid queue pair content. XXX This should
> -				* be changed to a connection reset in a later
> -				* change.
> -				*/
> -
> -				err = -ENOMEM;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> -
> -			err = transport->notify_recv_pre_dequeue(
> -					vsk, target, &recv_data);
> -			if (err < 0)
> -				break;
> +		err = transport->notify_recv_pre_dequeue(vsk, target,
> +							 &recv_data);
> +		if (err < 0)
> +			break;
> 
> -			read = transport->stream_dequeue(
> -					vsk, msg,
> -					len - copied, flags);
> -			if (read < 0) {
> -				err = -ENOMEM;
> -				break;
> -			}
> +		read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
> +		if (read < 0) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			break;
> +		}
> 
> -			copied += read;
> +		copied += read;
> 
> -			err = transport->notify_recv_post_dequeue(
> -					vsk, target, read,
> -					!(flags & MSG_PEEK), &recv_data);
> -			if (err < 0)
> -				goto out;
> +		err = transport->notify_recv_post_dequeue(vsk, target, read,
> +						!(flags & MSG_PEEK), &recv_data);
> +		if (err < 0)
> +			goto out;
> 
> -			if (read >= target || flags & MSG_PEEK)
> -				break;
> +		if (read >= target || flags & MSG_PEEK)
> +			break;
> 
> -			target -= read;
> -		}
> +		target -= read;
> 	}
> 
> 	if (sk->sk_err)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18  5:33 [RFC PATCH v5 00/19] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:36 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/19] af_vsock: update functions for connectible socket Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 10:50   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-22 10:58     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 11:09       ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-18  5:36 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/19] af_vsock: separate wait data loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 11:29   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-25 14:24   ` Jorgen Hansen [this message]
2021-02-25 17:01     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:36 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/19] af_vsock: separate receive " Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 11:43   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-18  5:37 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/19] af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET receive loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 11:53   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-25 16:27   ` Jorgen Hansen
2021-02-25 17:00     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:37 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/19] af_vsock: separate wait space loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 12:06   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-18  5:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/19] af_vsock: implement send logic for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/19] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 14:12   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-18  5:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/19] af_vsock: update comments for stream sockets Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 14:18   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-18  5:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/19] virtio/vsock: set packet's type in send Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-23 13:42   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-18  5:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/19] virtio/vsock: simplify credit update function API Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-23 13:49   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-18  5:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/19] virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-23 14:15   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-23 14:17   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24  5:07     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-24  6:41       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24  8:31         ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-27  8:58         ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/19] virtio/vsock: fetch length for SEQPACKET record Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/19] virtio/vsock: add SEQPACKET receive logic Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/19] virtio/vsock: rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/19] virtio/vsock: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/19] vhost/vsock: " Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/19] vsock/loopback: " Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:42 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/19] vsock_test: add SOCK_SEQPACKET tests Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-18  5:42 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/19] virtio/vsock: update trace event for SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-03-02 22:25   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-03 10:42     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-22 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/19] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-23 14:50   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-24  4:29     ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-24  8:23       ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-24  8:28         ` Arseny Krasnov
2021-02-24  8:35           ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-02-24  8:36             ` Arseny Krasnov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E5526501-3A87-4349-8D7F-61782AA1F513@vmware.com \
    --to=jhansen@vmware.com \
    --cc=andraprs@amazon.com \
    --cc=arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nslusarek@gmx.net \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=stsp2@yandex.ru \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).