netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To: "'netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org'"
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'netdev@vger.kernel.org'" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: netfilter: iptables-restore: setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE, "security...", ...) return -EAGAIN
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 06:02:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR2101MB08925E481FFFF8AB7A3ACDAFBF519@MW2PR2101MB0892.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR2101MB0892864684CFDB096E0DBF02BF519@MW2PR2101MB0892.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>

> From: Dexuan Cui
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 9:19 PM
> ...
> I think the latest mainline kernel should also have the same race.
> It looks like this by-design race exists since day one?

I indeed reproduced the issue with the latest stable tree (v5.12.3) as well.

> > BTW, iptables does have a retry mechanism for getsockopt():
> > 2f93205b375e ("Retry ruleset dump when kernel returns EAGAIN.")
> >
> (https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/libiptc?id=2f93205b375e&context=10
> > &ignorews=0&dt=0)
> >
> > But it looks like this is enough? 
I missed a "not". IMO 2f93205b375e is not enough.

Thanks,
-- Dexuan

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-13  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12 22:17 netfilter: iptables-restore: setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE, "security...", ...) return -EAGAIN Dexuan Cui
2021-05-13  4:19 ` Dexuan Cui
2021-05-13  6:02   ` Dexuan Cui [this message]
2021-05-13  6:19     ` Dexuan Cui
2021-05-13  9:40       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-13 17:08         ` Phil Sutter
2021-05-13 20:40           ` Dexuan Cui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW2PR2101MB08925E481FFFF8AB7A3ACDAFBF519@MW2PR2101MB0892.namprd21.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).