From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from w4.tutanota.de (w4.tutanota.de [81.3.6.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CECE1DFD2 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=81.3.6.165 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711009756; cv=none; b=oUbCSi3FClUR/J7NCkCdofafId3F9TK1HIc4bYcxKfXi+fTCOgi2XxENHDc/mCATfeHDJyxeSKaLoYe0tAyLKJsv+cqoIL0Ro/4luxvWnwlZooop+Z1XS+o52PIL4S4XtzCRpIeM9pwTzfW461lCJamv27oV1R5ih5/ADflBcIw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711009756; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2V1nTFt2diEohmhfAUKGzJ0EWP63RxdFbT/k7yY4lZE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vb3vKOBwzC97m3TYj2I/KbujD09EJUk9UrS3b4vMLrTFIn2GIXDFCAs7+MpjXpdoHCaEIaWKp56Rd+uTWwZUnMo6SMqEjKPLY7mRxJ6C81g8YVmNhBVe9PvMdqHVm5afUof6bUX9oLN5RFLScjvdXMLgVyhzJIHPJJjyl08SR2Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lynne.ee; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lynne.ee; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lynne.ee header.i=@lynne.ee header.b=J5ur5qdj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=81.3.6.165 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lynne.ee Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lynne.ee Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lynne.ee header.i=@lynne.ee header.b="J5ur5qdj" Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAD41060254; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:29:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1711009743; s=s1; d=lynne.ee; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=2V1nTFt2diEohmhfAUKGzJ0EWP63RxdFbT/k7yY4lZE=; b=J5ur5qdjhZwdS+BBCfRu3lhSEs7waEmDuoQ3tAN2iN5xzTNor4KRJX1uG8Khoj1x G4+wiUt0qxR79i5ckjI02S94aJ4W8oIUsdTF6wHYsom9u/3pwf963++XH9DjiHZcaSv 9Bq33JrNRCkZtZPpzOYC8BsUr28FCI4g18OKeaMUUXC8FXHI5Fi9XJUmVmjQzRxaiHi JLUaw1UMg41eLsdoLhlr5Y0XLm+BVQkrpDB7DeHNkltzV7oW0p21eajZRJrdUlxPtWL /0Zx0648nl0kUlf289/oN+w33kzxZuzAhvS51ov55GswCKlMSn+Y+O9WIeqga4MgWPH Awps5NJPaQ== Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:29:03 +0100 (CET) From: Lynne To: Netdev Cc: Kuniyu , Willemdebruijn Kernel Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Regarding UDP-Lite deprecation and removal Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mar 17, 2024, 01:34 by dev@lynne.ee: > Hello, > > UDP-Lite was scheduled to be removed in 2025 in commit > be28c14ac8bbe1ff due to a lack of real-world users, and > a long-outstanding security bug being left undiscovered. > > I would like to open a discussion to perhaps either avoid this, > or delay it, conditionally. > Ping. To be clear, I am offering to maintain it if the current maintainers do not have time to. Should I send a patch to remove the warning? I wanted to know the opinions of the ones who maintain/deprecated the code first.