From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Ying Hsu <yinghsu@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
chromeos-bluetooth-upstreaming@chromium.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix possible deadlock in rfcomm_sk_state_change
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 08:51:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7UiDn3Gi5YdNIoC@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230103111221.1.I1f29bb547a03e9adfe2e6754212f9d14a2e39c4b@changeid>
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 11:12:46AM +0000, Ying Hsu wrote:
> There's a possible deadlock when two processes are connecting
> and closing concurrently:
> + CPU0: __rfcomm_dlc_close locks rfcomm and then calls
> rfcomm_sk_state_change which locks the sock.
> + CPU1: rfcomm_sock_connect locks the socket and then calls
> rfcomm_dlc_open which locks rfcomm.
>
> Here's the call trace:
>
> -> #2 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
> __mutex_lock0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
> __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15d/0x890 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c:487
> rfcomm_dlc_close+1e9/0x240 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c:520
> __rfcomm_sock_close+0x13c/0x250 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:220
> rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0xd8/0x230 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:907
> rfcomm_sock_release+0x68/0x140 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:928
> __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:650
> sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1365
> __fput+0x27c/0xa90 fs/file_table.c:320
> task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179
> exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]
> do_exit+0xaa8/0x2950 kernel/exit.c:867
> do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1012
> get_signal+0x21c3/0x2450 kernel/signal.c:2859
> arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5c0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:306
> exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:203
> __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:285 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:296
> do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> -> #1 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
> rfcomm_dlc_open+0x93/0xa80 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c:425
> rfcomm_sock_connect+0x329/0x450 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:413
> __sys_connect_file+0x153/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1976
> __sys_connect+0x165/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1993
> __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2003 [inline]
> __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2000 [inline]
> __x64_sys_connect+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:2000
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+.}-{0:0}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
> lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3470
> lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1725 [inline]
> rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x6d/0x3a0 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:73
> __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x1b1/0x890 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c:489
> rfcomm_dlc_close+0x1e9/0x240 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/core.c:520
> __rfcomm_sock_close+0x13c/0x250 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:220
> rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0xd8/0x230 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:907
> rfcomm_sock_release+0x68/0x140 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:928
> __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:650
> sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1365
> __fput+0x27c/0xa90 fs/file_table.c:320
> task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179
> exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]
> do_exit+0xaa8/0x2950 kernel/exit.c:867
> do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1012
> get_signal+0x21c3/0x2450 kernel/signal.c:2859
> arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x79/0x5c0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:306
> exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:203
> __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:285 [inline]
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:296
> do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu <yinghsu@chromium.org>
> ---
> This commit has been tested with a C reproducer on qemu-x86_64.
>
> net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> index 21e24da4847f..29f9a88a3dc8 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> @@ -410,8 +410,10 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int a
> d->sec_level = rfcomm_pi(sk)->sec_level;
> d->role_switch = rfcomm_pi(sk)->role_switch;
>
> + release_sock(sk);
> err = rfcomm_dlc_open(d, &rfcomm_pi(sk)->src, &sa->rc_bdaddr,
^^^^
Are you sure that "sk" still exists here after you called to release_sock(sk)?
What prevents from use-after-free here?
> sa->rc_channel);
> + lock_sock(sk);
> if (!err)
> err = bt_sock_wait_state(sk, BT_CONNECTED,
> sock_sndtimeo(sk, flags & O_NONBLOCK));
> --
> 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-03 11:12 [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix possible deadlock in rfcomm_sk_state_change Ying Hsu
2023-01-04 6:51 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2023-01-06 0:24 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-08 10:12 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-10 9:07 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-10 12:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-11 1:03 ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11 0:34 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2023-01-11 0:50 ` Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7UiDn3Gi5YdNIoC@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=chromeos-bluetooth-upstreaming@chromium.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghsu@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).