From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D486C433ED for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC0C61157 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238609AbhDSKXR (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:23:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47480 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238512AbhDSKXD (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:23:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384D5C06174A; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id o5so35224293qkb.0; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:22:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=363VWPLcAU951lFrOwLAp4x5JJh1Vw/iAvcAFa7MyZk=; b=R5XQ5iZqatSvkNTU0qHCUsd0p3WT01/W6ntNqMUmTduyEm8YkOXTdWM+oK7ac+tcoA NRmOJX4f9vdm9iTRu91lqQRl70RW/TSL+7MtEm5wLDZfwkOYlSjr9fbNTNh0B39Kkowt Bi5WZpYn1Yk1+IA8xtPcgYX06Hc33xaf5QMYf98EMh39ixuRDZYsdE44bN8c3rKjNycy jnZyz9fV93XN3GZEzzlU5szM0TFi6FCAXCFHq/Ps8ZSC0T1AxjC3mG1EKcJOT97anYWt U3yn+hc4TLXFo1m12iRukb3HKdEu392+NfVNdvyNa/vpzSe/a3swEafL+a3B1hbuQLS1 hhHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=363VWPLcAU951lFrOwLAp4x5JJh1Vw/iAvcAFa7MyZk=; b=bIywzl1my8NHAvWAiXi1qnU9dYmoQOVmpzLg9qB3O4YYqSScR/sYxYiU2V7N+xtOQD U6q+Lo5sezkHXKYMoYr6u61lCVpdSjHaLJM8lRZdLyBO/Ocyj34L13whrh3aBzgZsxWB 4YfxCp1q7gb0QbmXQvwmvp/J86Q7c9b1ebO2DIYwoxkqbxGXLqOuuj/ozzNgWefEaQ1X dBy5o73gfU2IlAyWwemK8Yvq6fkO0rK3wkSTbkWDXWdcVb0dmqB25v8jCaQLLhiSHN4v JNIW8ElA8SUiQdNZtgHkiJNpP2AqwJBVIqyeLLHO4gysKVUWfnCIjWbI6zIaSyIreIGf aSWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339/Sk3gMsvN1tkHE6qQYfh/y4IBNOYIuzRIZndJWAI8MlLZCWp xz/lvgvSUdTGrWckWlAu5uj87pf0AsOJPQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwv0PfWbwbywYMr0ja8rTRSIwkz72j7PM0deJVOZmAzf8SeX58JgPPuNxZ50gh2CISo9QcD3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a37:814:: with SMTP id 20mr10509400qki.230.1618827753300; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dhcp-6c-ae-f6-dc-d8-61.cpe.echoes.net. [199.96.183.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z17sm8506175qtf.10.2021.04.19.03.22.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:22:31 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: jiangshanlai@gmail.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, bvanassche@acm.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue: Have 'alloc_workqueue()' like macros accept a format specifier Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hello, Christophe. On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 11:25:52PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Improve 'create_workqueue', 'create_freezable_workqueue' and > 'create_singlethread_workqueue' so that they accept a format > specifier and a variable number of arguments. > > This will put these macros more in line with 'alloc_ordered_workqueue' and > the underlying 'alloc_workqueue()' function. Those interfaces are deprecated and if you're doing anything with the users, the right course of action would be converting them to use one of the alloc_workqueue interfaces. Thanks. -- tejun