From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696D3C4338F for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F72660FC1 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231866AbhHHPKm (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2021 11:10:42 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54839 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229923AbhHHPKk (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2021 11:10:40 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450A85C0138; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 11:10:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 11:10:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=A3McFW /Tsb3OKh9FbJRLMsHA77wmBtDHnBMwu04wS+w=; b=BJl/M+dHJkzc75VMwsib6Z e18G3STF4xDt/qL349ZOuAMmdhdYziD9YmpVBmeVCj1q/pTfIHFas3Gx6DY9P/Ys 9gEerLfodgs/SRo0ZyuLPO635l5k9kitFWo/ckrOPtH9wrkJANYT8RrvwVU/5byn 6ucwk8Xb2ir0C07K3MqqMMeTnJ2hKYRS3xmyDiZSQQCJMEBLByRE5RgvrZZTMykG jsWnaiI8dSQyzFhN0icYPkjtdlUyyqEAQDpNN76WpJlj6gnXb8M3a5/kWoS8Yn7m wC1MOodVLUpH78uiCmhEznJbJpzDuMpQtvz+T7LQYVX9sWqX/Zwx9NEY9AkKCIeQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrjeehgdekhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcuufgt hhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiughoshgthhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnheptdffkeekfeduffevgeeujeffjefhtefgueeugfevtdeiheduueeukefhudehleet necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepihguoh hstghhsehiughoshgthhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 11:10:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 18:10:16 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel To: Mark Bloch Cc: Cong Wang , vladbu@nvidia.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next] net_sched: refactor TC action init API Message-ID: References: <20210729231214.22762-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 06:00:51PM +0300, Mark Bloch wrote: > We hit the same issue, I have the bellow patch and it solved the issue for us: OK, looks good. Replaced my patch with yours. Will let you know tomorrow if I still see the issue (unlikely). Thanks