netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to allocate and insert CT
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:02:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtpnmI1oPOQRv3j3@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721134245.2450-8-memxor@gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 03:42:39PM +0200, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h
> index 37866c8386e2..83a60c684e6c 100644
> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h
> @@ -84,4 +84,19 @@ void nf_conntrack_lock(spinlock_t *lock);
>  
>  extern spinlock_t nf_conntrack_expect_lock;
>  
> +/* ctnetlink code shared by both ctnetlink and nf_conntrack_bpf */
> +
> +#if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF)) || \
> +    (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES) || \
> +    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK))

There must be a better way to do this without ifdef pollution?

Could you fix this?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-22  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21 13:42 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] New nf_conntrack kfuncs for insertion, changing timeout, status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/13] bpf: Introduce 8-byte BTF set Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/13] tools/resolve_btfids: Add support for 8-byte BTF sets Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 20:51   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/13] bpf: Switch to new kfunc flags infrastructure Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/13] bpf: Add support for forcing kfunc args to be trusted Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22  4:10   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-22 10:26     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-25  9:52   ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-26  9:30     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-26 10:02       ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-26 12:55         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-26 12:58           ` Roberto Sassu
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/13] bpf: Add documentation for kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/13] net: netfilter: Deduplicate code in bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_lookup Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to allocate and insert CT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22  9:02   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-07-22  9:39     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-23  7:50       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-07-25  8:52         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT timeout Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for trusted kfunc args Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for new nf_conntrack kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add negative " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 13/13] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier failed test in unprivileged mode Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-21 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/13] New nf_conntrack kfuncs for insertion, changing timeout, status Zvi Effron
2022-07-21 18:01   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-22  4:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YtpnmI1oPOQRv3j3@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).