From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D54B920DCC; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710930313; cv=none; b=Oh3GLLzWlfHFyYMIeMdUjvj5ez2uYiw+fqakZ8UIwf86SAwhKra1JjTcF12TqXk23YMG9zuvbsjMdaiRZ9Q5J5j7SBOv+/3S7k31oLGHpvk2U/5GfJMOX4n2JS3Bhdd/0Zl4B2YevT0u67wr+F0L7SUDgL/zNIh6BwE15+wkbdQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710930313; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uTcargHZKKJsnlZ8QYB+opWvxlRzkGKEhRBmIEMOosM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GnuyaZVl0uXua4wjRgYbimE+g1YkAf9X3bEJzaBkiWJ4+JyKgxMI6r6tFzUCsEdZXf3BIe3LkzuXMCdvFOLFl75V1DGBMSSw7U8cezK7bGXZ7nrGYfgrY0eQedp2TqZiZFdyK4VdFZ+hqTUVQaq0QyDdWMjEIpIDhYFaj9N5T28= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=O3ck4nie; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="O3ck4nie" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710930311; x=1742466311; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uTcargHZKKJsnlZ8QYB+opWvxlRzkGKEhRBmIEMOosM=; b=O3ck4nieOKRACVbB59zRZklqL9WqaUjX765FefxZDPDmITUdpGLwll3T P+dj9/aDhUX7fCzB9XZpkEw3WF+M62J8GJMYxPuliVJN3/iD3mIfRGMuT cQH47m9ts6GftbrUiUMqITSIqZrFUeybgarvMH8GcpkKYdadCYVDwAGKQ 9yE4j4Pww/nw74NjSA1GE1+ranKLOVR/nl0j3MaJnO+YOSG0EpYDCJvcD EjQeRcGtmKvjIa7wI7y1obF2K+l0XhsCuVYpV5zVEEwslJiBXOxE2emSN SOY9K0gslD1zLTzVWShAPTvKMgohzoaiyDKQQZ2Mx3C/VdTNcG3BtSbaG w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11018"; a="23303418" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,139,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="23303418" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2024 03:25:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11018"; a="914661971" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,139,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914661971" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2024 03:25:08 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rmt85-0000000EXTT-2jCU; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:25:05 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:25:05 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jiri Pirko Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wolfgang Grandegger , Marc Kleine-Budde , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] can: mcp251x: Fix up includes Message-ID: References: <20240318193410.178163-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:25:19AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 08:34:10PM CET, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: > >This driver is including the legacy GPIO header > >but the only thing it is using from that header is the wrong > >define for GPIOF_DIR_OUT. > > > >Fix it up by using GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_* macros respectively. > > net-next is closed, send again next week. Thank you for the reminder. I have a question though. Can net adapt to the existence of lore.kernel.org please? I mean it's not big deal to me to resend, but: 1) it adds too much noise in already noisy mailing lists; 2) it brings no value since we have lore.kernel.org archive; 3) last but not least, it saves a lot of resources and becomes environment friendly when we send _less_ emails. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko