From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 383C01171D; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710933617; cv=none; b=fM4iJoByaqYd34ATfVJP3jYI8dIOlrkUNO4P77xuSla0FavxJ7bjUAnJEt9hTpkBgZ2ZuO8fiG8KBcZMtqLEZjIrrr0HAG/XMDrWv+hA7ZkajyhOvWYWtoLhDm0ntE+59Wyxwx+Pt4ub9Cb4uyHVZgiO+M7v19ZJ9Q/wRDoHgeE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710933617; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z9hg5EXdykW7ItUDyXwEvhhKYYeWiKG2rtC3DZQzepI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pRNF/HMq9KroDT2x8g2Wb5BlNsEVDmaEVBEMYrf2Q4LE8uQziNGMv1Xgu+rNp2VS77SOaszCEXRFRqIvD9h/m4etmO56FWcVUm9wy3YR8zdKfrdgzH6gWniYj2JljqLgMFnu1cZonDJ8ZNFCbxWSiiPiR7cIfTWroKDCP1zV+aU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FOfzyC0Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FOfzyC0Y" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710933617; x=1742469617; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=z9hg5EXdykW7ItUDyXwEvhhKYYeWiKG2rtC3DZQzepI=; b=FOfzyC0Y5MC+X3TdBKAgVTx9iX2gOzbfypmLu1hPyK5kWExyhRbtfD43 qIP+dfxTul7sAZz9pkJRuLON0Uq9fTuvZ1N3K7w2/3YbxBO+VGAD5Dzp4 SoJKOEztRRHGpLI8Cbt+RiYu9uHFcBFElYGXgD0uF/r+ShNcuzT9Agrr0 usf8KXElO9/BBuQzs6LtXjo30g8dr1RZootUOCcptjOVUdPS4pYW77ncY 0JkvE1WajGrVTmYRUZmx5v5pUxji/hTQpg/kn/tl/21GZDVkOaGUwEmZG fdMcvfm2WfJxrVfPvb1Y0pfGTciXebZKQpZudQSjEZb+xFsD4pbKlI2Xf Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11018"; a="17296502" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,140,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="17296502" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2024 04:20:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11018"; a="914663552" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,140,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914663552" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Mar 2024 04:20:13 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rmtzP-0000000EYLr-2d33; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:20:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:20:11 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Simon Horman Cc: Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] nfc: st95hf: Switch to using gpiod API Message-ID: References: <20240318203923.183943-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240320111258.GP185808@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240320111258.GP185808@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:12:58AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:25:34AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 09:39:23PM CET, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > >This updates the driver to gpiod API, and removes yet another use of > > > >of_get_named_gpio(). > > > > > > > net-next is closed, send again next week. > > > > Same Q: Why to resend? Can't you utilise lore.kernel.org? > > Because that is how Netdev development currently operates. > A system which I believe emerged as a way to handle the > enormous volume of patches involved. Maybe it could change, > but that is a different conversation. > > Other subsystems work differently, and that is fine too. > > https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#git-trees-and-patch-flow I see that this is the limitation of patchwork and/or nobody wants to "reopen" the patch based on Message-ID. Still I believe it's possible to make it smarter. In any case, I'll resend the patch(es) and try to keep in mind, that during merge window net is a black hole (astronomically speaking). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko