Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] can: flexcan: fix deadlock when using self wakeup

[Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3244 bytes --]

On 11/27/19 6:56 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
> 
> When suspending, when there is still can traffic on the interfaces the
> flexcan immediately wakes the platform again. As it should :-). But it
> throws this error msg:
> [ 3169.378661] PM: noirq suspend of devices failed
> 
> On the way down to suspend the interface that throws the error message does
> call flexcan_suspend but fails to call flexcan_noirq_suspend. That means the
> flexcan_enter_stop_mode is called, but on the way out of suspend the driver
> only calls flexcan_resume and skips flexcan_noirq_resume, thus it doesn't call
> flexcan_exit_stop_mode. This leaves the flexcan in stop mode, and with the
> current driver it can't recover from this even with a soft reboot, it requires
> a hard reboot.
> 
> This patch can fix deadlock when using self wakeup, it happenes to be
> able to fix another issue that frames out-of-order in first IRQ handler
> run after wakeup.
> 
> In wakeup case, after system resume, frames received out-of-order in
> first IRQ handler, the problem is wakeup latency from frame reception to
> IRQ handler is much bigger than the counter overflow. This means it's
> impossible to sort the CAN frames by timestamp. The reason is that controller
> exits stop mode during noirq resume, then it can receive the frame immediately.
> If noirq reusme stage consumes much time, it will extend interrupt response
> time. So exit stop mode during resume stage instead of noirq resume can
> fix this issue.
> 
> Fixes: de3578c198c6 ("can: flexcan: add self wakeup support")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
> ------
> ChangeLog:
> 	V1->V2: no change.
> ---
>  drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> index 2efa06119f68..2297663cacb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> @@ -134,8 +134,7 @@
>  	(FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_BUS | FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_STATE)
>  #define FLEXCAN_ESR_ALL_INT \
>  	(FLEXCAN_ESR_TWRN_INT | FLEXCAN_ESR_RWRN_INT | \
> -	 FLEXCAN_ESR_BOFF_INT | FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_INT | \
> -	 FLEXCAN_ESR_WAK_INT)
> +	 FLEXCAN_ESR_BOFF_INT | FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_INT)

Why do you remove the FLEXCAN_ESR_WAK_INT from the FLEXCAN_ESR_ALL_INT?

>  
>  /* FLEXCAN interrupt flag register (IFLAG) bits */
>  /* Errata ERR005829 step7: Reserve first valid MB */
> @@ -960,6 +959,12 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  
>  	reg_esr = priv->read(&regs->esr);
>  
> +	/* ACK wakeup interrupt */
> +	if (reg_esr & FLEXCAN_ESR_WAK_INT) {
> +		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
> +		priv->write(reg_esr & FLEXCAN_ESR_WAK_INT, &regs->esr);
> +	}
> +

If FLEXCAN_ESR_WAK_INT stays in FLEXCAN_ESR_ALL_INT, you don't need that
explicit ACK here.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]