archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <>
To: DENG Qingfang <>, Roopa Prabhu <>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <>,
	David Miller <>, Andrew Lunn <>,
	Jakub Kicinski <>,,
	netdev <>,
	Vivien Didelot <>,
	Vladimir Oltean <>
Subject: Re: Bridge port isolation offload
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 02:43:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 8/9/2021 9:40 PM, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> Hi,
> Bridge port isolation flag (BR_ISOLATED) was added in commit
> 7d850abd5f4e. But switchdev does not offload it currently.
> It should be easy to implement in drivers, just like bridge offload
> but prevent isolated ports to communicate with each other.
> Your thoughts?

It maps well on Broadcom switches but there was not a known use case 
AFAICT that warranted mapping this flag to program the switch hardware 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-10  4:40 Bridge port isolation offload DENG Qingfang
2021-08-10  9:43 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-08-10 10:42 ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).