From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>, elic@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:17:49 +0800 Message-ID: <c188353e-9aca-a94c-e8f5-4bad5942481c@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210223045600-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On 2021/2/23 6:01 下午, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 05:46:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2021/2/23 下午5:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:09:28AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote: >>>> On 2/21/2021 8:14 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> On 2021/2/19 7:54 下午, Si-Wei Liu wrote: >>>>>> Commit 452639a64ad8 ("vdpa: make sure set_features is invoked >>>>>> for legacy") made an exception for legacy guests to reset >>>>>> features to 0, when config space is accessed before features >>>>>> are set. We should relieve the verify_min_features() check >>>>>> and allow features reset to 0 for this case. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's worth noting that not just legacy guests could access >>>>>> config space before features are set. For instance, when >>>>>> feature VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is advertised some modern driver >>>>>> will try to access and validate the MTU present in the config >>>>>> space before virtio features are set. >>>>> This looks like a spec violation: >>>>> >>>>> " >>>>> >>>>> The following driver-read-only field, mtu only exists if >>>>> VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is set. This field specifies the maximum MTU for the >>>>> driver to use. >>>>> " >>>>> >>>>> Do we really want to workaround this? >>>> Isn't the commit 452639a64ad8 itself is a workaround for legacy guest? >>>> >>>> I think the point is, since there's legacy guest we'd have to support, this >>>> host side workaround is unavoidable. Although I agree the violating driver >>>> should be fixed (yes, it's in today's upstream kernel which exists for a >>>> while now). >>> Oh you are right: >>> >>> >>> static int virtnet_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>> { >>> if (!vdev->config->get) { >>> dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n", >>> __func__); >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> >>> if (!virtnet_validate_features(vdev)) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) { >>> int mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev, >>> offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, >>> mtu)); >>> if (mtu < MIN_MTU) >>> __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU); >> >> I wonder why not simply fail here? > Back in 2016 it went like this: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:10:59PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) { > > + dev->mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev, > > + offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, > > + mtu)); > > + } > > + > > if (vi->any_header_sg) > > dev->needed_headroom = vi->hdr_len; > > > > One comment though: I think we should validate the mtu. > If it's invalid, clear VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU and ignore. > > > Too late at this point :) > > I guess it's a way to tell device "I can not live with this MTU", > device can fail FEATURES_OK if it wants to. MIN_MTU > is an internal linux thing and at the time I felt it's better to > try to make progress. What if e.g the device advertise a large MTU. E.g 64K here? In that case, the driver can not live either. Clearing MTU won't help here. Thanks > > >>> } >>> >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> And the spec says: >>> >>> >>> The driver MUST follow this sequence to initialize a device: >>> 1. Reset the device. >>> 2. Set the ACKNOWLEDGE status bit: the guest OS has noticed the device. >>> 3. Set the DRIVER status bit: the guest OS knows how to drive the device. >>> 4. Read device feature bits, and write the subset of feature bits understood by the OS and driver to the >>> device. During this step the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration >>> fields to check that it can support the device before accepting it. >>> 5. Set the FEATURES_OK status bit. The driver MUST NOT accept new feature bits after this step. >>> 6. Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set: otherwise, the device does not >>> support our subset of features and the device is unusable. >>> 7. Perform device-specific setup, including discovery of virtqueues for the device, optional per-bus setup, >>> reading and possibly writing the device’s virtio configuration space, and population of virtqueues. >>> 8. Set the DRIVER_OK status bit. At this point the device is “live”. >>> >>> >>> Item 4 on the list explicitly allows reading config space before >>> FEATURES_OK. >>> >>> I conclude that VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is set means "set in device features". >> >> So this probably need some clarification. "is set" is used many times in the >> spec that has different implications. >> >> Thanks >> >> >>> Generally it is worth going over feature dependent config fields >>> and checking whether they should be present when device feature is set >>> or when feature bit has been negotiated, and making this clear. >>>
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-19 11:54 Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-21 14:44 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-21 21:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-22 6:05 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-23 9:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 9:48 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 9:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-22 4:14 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-22 7:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 1:12 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-23 2:03 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 13:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 19:35 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-24 3:20 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 5:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:02 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 6:45 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-24 6:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:55 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 7:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 12:40 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-24 7:17 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-24 5:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:04 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 6:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:53 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 7:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [not found] ` <babc654d-8dcd-d8a2-c3b6-d20cc4fc554c@redhat.com> 2021-02-24 8:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 9:30 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-28 21:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 3:53 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 18:24 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-26 0:56 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-28 21:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 18:08 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-28 21:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-28 21:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 3:56 ` Jason Wang 2021-03-02 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-02 10:53 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-22 17:09 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-23 2:03 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 9:46 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 10:17 ` Jason Wang [this message] 2021-02-24 9:40 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 10:04 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck 2021-02-23 10:31 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 10:58 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-02-24 9:29 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 11:12 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-02-25 4:36 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-25 13:26 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-02-25 18:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-26 8:19 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-28 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 3:51 ` Jason Wang 2021-03-02 12:08 ` Cornelia Huck [not found] ` <5f6972fe-7246-b622-958d-9cab8dd98e21@redhat.com> 2021-03-03 8:29 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-03-04 8:24 ` Jason Wang 2021-03-04 13:50 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-03-05 3:01 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 12:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=c188353e-9aca-a94c-e8f5-4bad5942481c@redhat.com \ --to=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=elic@nvidia.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \ --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0 netdev/git/0.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1 netdev/git/1.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 netdev netdev/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev \ netdev@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index netdev Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.netdev AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git