From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: dp83867: Add speed optimization feature
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:01:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7a7bd71-3a1c-1cf3-5faa-204b10ea8b78@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7569617d-f69f-9190-1223-77d3be637753@gmail.com>
Florian
On 2/5/20 4:00 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 2/5/20 1:51 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Heiner
>>
>> On 2/5/20 3:16 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 04.02.2020 19:13, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>> Set the speed optimization bit on the DP83867 PHY.
>>>> This feature can also be strapped on the 64 pin PHY devices
>>>> but the 48 pin devices do not have the strap pin available to enable
>>>> this feature in the hardware. PHY team suggests to have this bit set.
>>>>
>>>> With this bit set the PHY will auto negotiate and report the link
>>>> parameters in the PHYSTS register. This register provides a single
>>>> location within the register set for quick access to commonly accessed
>>>> information.
>>>>
>>>> In this case when auto negotiation is on the PHY core reads the bits
>>>> that have been configured or if auto negotiation is off the PHY core
>>>> reads the BMCR register and sets the phydev parameters accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> This Giga bit PHY can throttle the speed to 100Mbps or 10Mbps to
>>>> accomodate a
>>>> 4-wire cable. If this should occur the PHYSTS register contains the
>>>> current negotiated speed and duplex mode.
>>>>
>>>> In overriding the genphy_read_status the dp83867_read_status will do a
>>>> genphy_read_status to setup the LP and pause bits. And then the PHYSTS
>>>> register is read and the phydev speed and duplex mode settings are
>>>> updated.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2 - Updated read status to call genphy_read_status first, added
>>>> link_change
>>>> callback to notify of speed change and use phy_set_bits -
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1188348/
>>>>
>>> As stated in the first review, it would be appreciated if you implement
>>> also the downshift tunable. This could be a separate patch in this
>>> series.
>>> Most of the implementation would be boilerplate code.
>> I just don't have a requirement from our customer to make it adjustable
>> so I did not want to add something extra.
>>
>> I can add in for v3.
>>
>>> And I have to admit that I'm not too happy with the term "speed
>>> optimization".
>>> This sounds like the PHY has some magic to establish a 1.2Gbps link.
>>> Even though the vendor may call it this way in the datasheet, the
>>> standard
>>> term is "downshift". I'm fine with using "speed optimization" in
>>> constants
>>> to be in line with the datasheet. Just a comment in the code would be
>>> helpful
>>> that speed optimization is the vendor's term for downshift.
>> Ack. The data sheet actually says "Speed optimization, also known as
>> link downshift"
>>
>> So I probably will just rename everything down shift.
>>
>>>> drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c
>>>> index 967f57ed0b65..6f86ca1ebb51 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c
>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>>> #define DP83867_DEVADDR 0x1f
>>>> #define MII_DP83867_PHYCTRL 0x10
>>>> +#define MII_DP83867_PHYSTS 0x11
>>>> #define MII_DP83867_MICR 0x12
>>>> #define MII_DP83867_ISR 0x13
>>>> #define DP83867_CFG2 0x14
>>>> @@ -118,6 +119,15 @@
>>>> #define DP83867_IO_MUX_CFG_CLK_O_SEL_MASK (0x1f << 8)
>>>> #define DP83867_IO_MUX_CFG_CLK_O_SEL_SHIFT 8
>>>> +/* PHY STS bits */
>>>> +#define DP83867_PHYSTS_1000 BIT(15)
>>>> +#define DP83867_PHYSTS_100 BIT(14)
>>>> +#define DP83867_PHYSTS_DUPLEX BIT(13)
>>>> +#define DP83867_PHYSTS_LINK BIT(10)
>>>> +
>>>> +/* CFG2 bits */
>>>> +#define DP83867_SPEED_OPTIMIZED_EN (BIT(8) | BIT(9))
>>>> +
>>>> /* CFG3 bits */
>>>> #define DP83867_CFG3_INT_OE BIT(7)
>>>> #define DP83867_CFG3_ROBUST_AUTO_MDIX BIT(9)
>>>> @@ -287,6 +297,43 @@ static int dp83867_config_intr(struct phy_device
>>>> *phydev)
>>>> return phy_write(phydev, MII_DP83867_MICR, micr_status);
>>>> }
>>>> +static void dp83867_link_change_notify(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (phydev->state != PHY_RUNNING)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (phydev->speed == SPEED_100 || phydev->speed == SPEED_10)
>>>> + phydev_warn(phydev, "Downshift detected connection is
>>>> %iMbps\n",
>>>> + phydev->speed);
>>> The link partner may simply not advertise 1Gbps. How do you know that
>>> a link speed of e.g. 100Mbps is caused by a downshift?
>>> Some PHY's I've seen with this feature have a flag somewhere indicating
>>> that downshift occurred. How about the PHY here?
>> I don't see a register that gives us that status
>>
>> I will ask the hardware team if there is one.
>>
>> This is a 1Gbps PHY by default so if a slower connection is established
>> due to faulty cabling or LP advertisement then this would be a down
>> shift IMO.
> With your current link_change_notify function it would not be possible
> to know whether the PHY was connected to a link partner that advertised
> only 10/100 and so 100 ended up being the link speed, or the link
> partner was capable of 10/100/1000 and downshift reduced the link speed.
>
> If you cannot tell the difference from a register, it might be better to
> simply omit that function then.
Yeah I thought it was a bit redundant and wonky to see in the log that
the link established to xG/Mbps and then see another message saying the
downshift occurred.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-04 18:13 [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: dp83867: Add speed optimization feature Dan Murphy
2020-02-04 20:08 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-02-04 20:30 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-05 21:16 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-02-05 21:51 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-05 22:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-02-05 22:01 ` Dan Murphy [this message]
2020-02-14 18:32 ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-02-14 18:31 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-18 14:07 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-18 16:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-18 16:36 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-18 16:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-18 17:12 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-18 17:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-18 17:38 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-19 0:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-06 22:13 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-06 22:28 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-02-06 22:36 ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-06 23:04 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-02-06 23:23 ` Dan Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7a7bd71-3a1c-1cf3-5faa-204b10ea8b78@ti.com \
--to=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).