netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Kehuan Feng <kehuan.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Jike Song" <albcamus@gmail.com>, Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@netrounds.com>,
	Michael Zhivich <mzhivich@akamai.com>,
	"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxarm@huawei.com" <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:10:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c97908eb-5a0b-363c-93fd-59c037bbd9f0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpUq9-wja3JHz9+TMeXGyAOmJfZDxWUZJ9v25i7vd0Z-Wg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2020/9/11 4:19, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 8:21 PM Kehuan Feng <kehuan.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I also tried Cong's patch (shown below on my tree) and it could avoid
>> the issue (stressing for 30 minutus for three times and not jitter
>> observed).
> 
> Thanks for verifying it!
> 
>>
>> --- ./include/net/sch_generic.h.orig 2020-08-21 15:13:51.787952710 +0800
>> +++ ./include/net/sch_generic.h 2020-09-03 21:36:11.468383738 +0800
>> @@ -127,8 +127,7 @@
>>  static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
>>  {
>>   if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) {
>> - if (!spin_trylock(&qdisc->seqlock))
>> - return false;
>> + spin_lock(&qdisc->seqlock);
>>   } else if (qdisc_is_running(qdisc)) {
>>   return false;
>>   }
>>
>> I am not actually know what you are discussing above. It seems to me
>> that Cong's patch is similar as disabling lockless feature.
> 
>>From performance's perspective, yeah. Did you see any performance
> downgrade with my patch applied? It would be great if you can compare
> it with removing NOLOCK. And if the performance is as bad as no
> NOLOCK, then we can remove the NOLOCK bit for pfifo_fast, at least
> for now.

It seems the lockless qdisc may have below concurrent problem:
  cpu0:                                                           cpu1:
q->enqueue							    .
qdisc_run_begin(q)  						    .
__qdisc_run(q) ->qdisc_restart() -> dequeue_skb()		    .
		                 -> sch_direct_xmit()		    .
 								    .
                                                                q->enqueue
				                             qdisc_run_begin(q)			
qdisc_run_end(q)


cpu1 enqueue a skb without calling __qdisc_run(), and cpu0 did not see the
enqueued skb when calling __qdisc_run(q) because cpu1 may enqueue the skb
after cpu0 called __qdisc_run(q) and before cpu0 called qdisc_run_end(q).


Kehuan, do you care to try the below patch if it is the same problem?

diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index d60e7c3..c97c1ed 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct qdisc_rate_table {
 enum qdisc_state_t {
 	__QDISC_STATE_SCHED,
 	__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED,
+	__QDISC_STATE_ENQUEUED,
 };

 struct qdisc_size_table {
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0362419..5985648 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3748,6 +3748,8 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
 	qdisc_calculate_pkt_len(skb, q);

 	if (q->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) {
+		set_bit(__QDISC_STATE_ENQUEUED, &q->state);
+		smp_mb__after_atomic();
 		rc = q->enqueue(skb, q, &to_free) & NET_XMIT_MASK;
 		qdisc_run(q);

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 265a61d..c389641 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ void __qdisc_run(struct Qdisc *q)
 	int quota = dev_tx_weight;
 	int packets;

+	clear_bit(__QDISC_STATE_ENQUEUED, &q->state);
+	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 	while (qdisc_restart(q, &packets)) {
 		quota -= packets;
 		if (quota <= 0) {
@@ -388,6 +390,9 @@ void __qdisc_run(struct Qdisc *q)
 			break;
 		}
 	}
+
+	if (test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_ENQUEUED, &q->state))
+		__netif_schedule(q);
 }

 unsigned long dev_trans_start(struct net_device *dev)


> 
> Thanks.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09  6:46 Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc Jonas Bonn
2019-10-09 19:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2019-10-10  6:27   ` Jonas Bonn
2019-10-11  0:39   ` Jonas Bonn
2020-06-23 13:42     ` Michael Zhivich
2020-06-30 19:14       ` Josh Hunt
2020-07-01  7:53         ` Jonas Bonn
2020-07-01 16:05         ` Cong Wang
2020-07-01 19:58           ` Cong Wang
2020-07-01 22:02             ` Josh Hunt
2020-07-02  6:14             ` Jonas Bonn
2020-07-02  9:45               ` Paolo Abeni
2020-07-02 18:08                 ` Josh Hunt
2020-07-07 14:18                   ` Paolo Abeni
2020-07-08 20:16                     ` Cong Wang
2020-07-09  9:20                       ` Paolo Abeni
2020-07-08 20:33                   ` Zhivich, Michael
2020-08-20  7:43                   ` Jike Song
2020-08-20 18:13                     ` Josh Hunt
     [not found]                     ` <20200822032800.16296-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-08-25  2:18                       ` Fengkehuan Feng
     [not found]                         ` <20200825032312.11776-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-08-25  7:14                           ` Fengkehuan Feng
     [not found]                             ` <20200825162329.11292-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-08-26  2:38                               ` Kehuan Feng
     [not found]                                 ` <CACS=qqKptAQQGiMoCs1Zgs9S4ZppHhasy1AK4df2NxnCDR+vCw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                                   ` <5f46032e.1c69fb81.9880c.7a6cSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
2020-08-27  6:56                                     ` Kehuan Feng
     [not found]                                       ` <20200827125747.5816-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-08-28  1:45                                         ` Kehuan Feng
2020-09-03  5:01                                           ` Cong Wang
2020-09-03  8:39                                             ` Paolo Abeni
2020-09-03 17:43                                               ` Cong Wang
2020-09-04  5:07                                                 ` John Fastabend
2020-09-10 20:15                                                   ` Cong Wang
2020-09-10 21:07                                                     ` John Fastabend
2020-09-10 21:40                                                       ` Paolo Abeni
2021-04-02 19:25                                                   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-04-02 19:33                                                     ` Josh Hunt
     [not found]                                                     ` <20210403003537.2032-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-03 12:23                                                       ` Jiri Kosina
2021-04-06  0:55                                                         ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-06  7:06                                                           ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-06 10:13                                                             ` Juergen Gross
2021-04-06 12:17                                                               ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-06  1:49                                                         ` Cong Wang
2021-04-06  2:46                                                           ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-06  7:31                                                             ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-06 12:24                                                               ` Yunsheng Lin
     [not found]                                               ` <20200903101957.428-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-09-04  3:20                                                 ` Kehuan Feng
2020-09-10 20:19                                                   ` Cong Wang
2020-09-14  2:10                                                     ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2020-09-17 19:52                                                       ` Cong Wang
2020-09-18  2:06                                                         ` Kehuan Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c97908eb-5a0b-363c-93fd-59c037bbd9f0@huawei.com \
    --to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=albcamus@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=jonas.bonn@netrounds.com \
    --cc=kehuan.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mzhivich@akamai.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).