From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1505CC46499 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55D72089C for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="lkW117w9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727564AbfGES1v (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jul 2019 14:27:51 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com ([209.85.160.194]:39820 "EHLO mail-qt1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726005AbfGES1u (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jul 2019 14:27:50 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id l9so3782288qtu.6; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:27:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=55JbN6zcysMUy2ZEV0xCsehVFqfZmF31tReahPIbYpE=; b=lkW117w9uXyWCnnqNc8EFXZb0GASxBo2JqAAECSQuoYYsXmO1K/rMjNLo3vTpxzwBL ial1FrtYO+8wcH03o1reYVaDuR1ZisT8/kevcTR9ew7Feq/FXU8JMGsUpIqN7YwFyir/ LHk78kOK0NQsO7OFT0YkYKrvRl6RT1hS3EGkM9jm9yJDll+AWnhGSUuKELYFleeHQeQZ woS8IIW5HbqQM6hgtfCzVd+jqHwSz4qJqjDjGa7aHIO752Hwh3MGZXk6rXVJuwjsOiRg 4rpy1L9dW6CjOJYGSODLYvqUtSCrcTaqNCiVkvqzhq4qmWaBmrYXYMoZ2Yj3GAOIFw2l aTig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=55JbN6zcysMUy2ZEV0xCsehVFqfZmF31tReahPIbYpE=; b=iTSt/m0ONj0G0ft5MXYk5iGcZ7GaOhyKpEpGBvJhRQWMHCEITIIC6lMP4y32Xly3zw F3r//EbGXLVxKcfS+Tb1r6PtB4jxihgVS3iFMrhpjOPxdLT6MgraRT1Sqfz2LLNyOAXb UDAW77PCyhRIF7w5RTd0RJiIvh8tXmlQmwmGRxx7oW0yNo+FrCX5wK9URCuLAGrkAHqj BcYVmnXib5JbhHZyPxbEHYrDd3WA8DBwyPWBClpcLTRZtgSmKJd3KprU4jKHIKd/2KOw daFYBUxYR1qAnhY+Nh4XjQha2TcIeMchDLNY+STxahN4ju1eA56o0CaZDPY8jeNZIytS 3LWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCyKSPkYrrC/g4m3j9JFK/XxUbAcZkbXIRAfTPga2dbBfXnn7E VYcMnkJJjqr+UhaUPi5Dxgk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxB0nlDAdH81y5ICSoFhLT2CIwCJsk09y2JWx23A0hHg/1YDABx7FwqwLndRwtvWMh26oHIyA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:47cd:: with SMTP id d13mr3751315qtr.156.1562351269354; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:10d:c0a8:11d1::107e? ([2620:10d:c091:480::a5e6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm4028410qth.76.2019.07.05.11.27.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:27:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Jes Sorensen X-Google-Original-From: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix wifi low signal strength issue of RTL8723BU To: Daniel Drake Cc: Chris Chiu , Kalle Valo , David Miller , linux-wireless , netdev , Linux Kernel , Linux Upstreaming Team , Larry Finger References: <20190627095247.8792-1-chiu@endlessm.com> <4c99866e-55b7-8852-c078-6b31dce21ee4@gmail.com> <89dbfb9d-a31a-9ecb-66bd-42ac0fc49e70@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 14:27:46 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 7/4/19 11:44 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:59 PM Jes Sorensen wrote: >> My point is this seems to be very dongle dependent :( We have to be >> careful not breaking it for some users while fixing it for others. > > Do you still have your device? > > Once we get to the point when you are happy with Chris's two patches > here on a code review level, we'll reach out to other driver > contributors plus people who previously complained about these types > of problems, and see if we can get some wider testing. I should have them, but I won't have access to them for another 2.5 weeks unfortunately. Cheers, Jes