netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] icmp: support rfc 4884
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:14:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb763bc5-b361-891a-94e9-be2385ddcbe0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200629165731.1553050-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>



On 6/29/20 9:57 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> 
> ICMP messages may include an extension structure after the original
> datagram. RFC 4884 standardized this behavior.
> 
> It introduces an explicit original datagram length field in the ICMP
> header to delineate the original datagram from the extension struct.
> 
> Return this field when reading an ICMP error from the error queue.

RFC mentions a 'length' field of 8 bits, your patch chose to export the whole
second word of icmp header.

Why is this field mapped to a prior one (icmp_hdr(skb)->un.gateway) ?

Should we add an element in the union to make this a little bit more explicit/readable ?

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h b/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h
index 5589eeb791ca580bb182e1dc38c05eab1c75adb9..427ed5a6765316a4c1e2fa06f3b6618447c01564 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct icmphdr {
                __be16  sequence;
        } echo;
        __be32  gateway;
+       __be32  second_word; /* RFC 4884 4.[123] : <unused:8>,<length:8>,<mtu:16> */
        struct {
                __be16  __unused;
                __be16  mtu;



> 
> ICMPv6 by default already returns the entire 32-bit part of the header
> that includes this field by default. For consistency, do the exact
> same for ICMP. So far it only returns mtu on ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED and gw
> on ICMP_PARAMETERPROB.
> 
> For backwards compatibility, make this optional, set by setsockopt
> SOL_IP/IP_RECVERR_RFC4884. For API documentation and feature test, see
> https://github.com/wdebruij/kerneltools/blob/master/tests/recv_icmp.c
> 
> Alternative implementation to reading from the skb in ip_icmp_error
> is to pass the field from icmp_unreach, again analogous to ICMPv6. But
> this would require changes to every $proto_err() callback, which for
> ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED pass the u32 info arg to a pmtu update function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> ---
>  include/net/inet_sock.h |  1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/in.h |  1 +
>  net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/inet_sock.h b/include/net/inet_sock.h
> index a7ce00af6c44..a3702d1d4875 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet_sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h
> @@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ struct inet_sock {
>  				mc_all:1,
>  				nodefrag:1;
>  	__u8			bind_address_no_port:1,
> +				recverr_rfc4884:1,
>  				defer_connect:1; /* Indicates that fastopen_connect is set
>  						  * and cookie exists so we defer connect
>  						  * until first data frame is written
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/in.h b/include/uapi/linux/in.h
> index 8533bf07450f..3d0d8231dc19 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/in.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/in.h
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ struct in_addr {
>  #define IP_CHECKSUM	23
>  #define IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT	24
>  #define IP_RECVFRAGSIZE	25
> +#define IP_RECVERR_RFC4884	26
>  
>  /* IP_MTU_DISCOVER values */
>  #define IP_PMTUDISC_DONT		0	/* Never send DF frames */
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> index 84ec3703c909..525140e3947c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> @@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ void ip_icmp_error(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int err,
>  	if (!skb)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (inet_sk(sk)->recverr_rfc4884)
> +		info = ntohl(icmp_hdr(skb)->un.gateway);

ntohl(icmp_hdr(skb)->un.second_word);

> +
>  	serr = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb);
>  	serr->ee.ee_errno = err;
>  	serr->ee.ee_origin = SO_EE_ORIGIN_ICMP;
> @@ -755,6 +758,7 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
>  	case IP_RECVORIGDSTADDR:
>  	case IP_CHECKSUM:
>  	case IP_RECVFRAGSIZE:
> +	case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
>  		if (optlen >= sizeof(int)) {
>  			if (get_user(val, (int __user *) optval))
>  				return -EFAULT;
> @@ -914,6 +918,11 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
>  		if (!val)
>  			skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_error_queue);
>  		break;
> +	case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
> +		if (val != 0 && val != 1)
> +			goto e_inval;
> +		inet->recverr_rfc4884 = val;
> +		break;
>  	case IP_MULTICAST_TTL:
>  		if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
>  			goto e_inval;
> @@ -1588,6 +1597,9 @@ static int do_ip_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
>  	case IP_RECVERR:
>  		val = inet->recverr;
>  		break;
> +	case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
> +		val = inet->recverr_rfc4884;
> +		break;
>  	case IP_MULTICAST_TTL:
>  		val = inet->mc_ttl;
>  		break;
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-29 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-29 16:57 [PATCH net-next] icmp: support rfc 4884 Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-29 20:34 ` Tom Herbert
2020-06-29 20:55   ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-29 21:14 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2020-06-29 21:30   ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-29 23:06     ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30  0:36       ` Tom Herbert
2020-06-30  2:18         ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-30 13:57           ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-30 16:16             ` Eric Dumazet
2020-06-30 16:41               ` Tom Herbert
2020-06-30 16:52                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-30 18:57                   ` Tom Herbert
2020-06-30 19:27                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-30 16:41               ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-06-30  0:30   ` Tom Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb763bc5-b361-891a-94e9-be2385ddcbe0@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).