From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885BCC4360F for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F521929 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=synopsys.com header.i=@synopsys.com header.b="Sp1Lxj8d" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389361AbfBONmT (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:42:19 -0500 Received: from smtprelay.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:43856 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726906AbfBONmT (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:42:19 -0500 Received: from mailhost1.synopsys.com (mailhost1.synopsys.com [10.12.238.239]) by smtprelay.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2A410C107D; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:42:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1550238139; bh=NWYxkmdZOi1SKjkvKKsU2uZ3PcH4jl6/8meIqcWLijg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Sp1Lxj8dxwyfI7hzacjqgobAGTIn3MJeyuyoVJE+kLHi8q4PbkxMKrVwmIAaW+FuD rTZ9ej+cfflp4TxxyHxvGZgnUJ0rWOj3Z+TqN2bnA+1KU+2IsUkqjBd+uobbC5YzrZ gAXPlivt6LNtC4afOQoVEGXuEaKGFuetdQMywzPMC6vK0lkH+9uKyGcxz449AbSwwc 6dIl9tfU2GEXzZ/nHCbA+A5w+5IfW8guipv+t6yGFBZPepp4vLjWIjDsouUNlXzywg n/1Oj8URw1hv3kkzhJq+D1eU/tDtFm5DMBetLKYGGm/jiAmPZKXlILt5FnpM2og+A4 SEs79Z+DOt77Q== Received: from de02dwia024.internal.synopsys.com (de02dwia024.internal.synopsys.com [10.225.19.81]) by mailhost1.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD6B5343; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:42:16 -0800 (PST) From: Jose Abreu To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jose Abreu , Florian Fainelli , Joao Pinto , "David S . Miller" , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: stmmac: Performance improvements in Multi-Queue Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:42:04 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Tested in XGMAC2 and GMAC5. I guess 1/3 can be backported but besides being a kind of "not that small" refactoring it's also for a scenario that no-one complained yet ... Advice ? Cc: Florian Fainelli Cc: Joao Pinto Cc: David S. Miller Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro Cc: Alexandre Torgue Jose Abreu (3): net: stmmac: Fix NAPI poll in TX path when in multi-queue net: stmmac: dwmac4: Also use TBU interrupt to clean TX path net: stmmac: dwxgmac2: Also use TBU interrupt to clean TX path drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_lib.c | 24 ++--- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2.h | 4 +- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c | 8 +- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 5 +- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 112 ++++++++++++--------- 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4