From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Vincent Prince <vincent.prince.fr@gmail.com>,
jiri@resnulli.us, jhs@mojatatu.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
dave.taht@gmail.com, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: sch_generic: Use pfifo_fast as fallback scheduler for CAN hardware
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:48:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0d865bd-7bc7-abb5-2b54-2c100c4b9a09@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022094254.489fd6a4@hermes.lan>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2010 bytes --]
On 10/22/19 6:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:53:44 +0200
> Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> On 10/22/19 3:23 PM, Vincent Prince wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Prince <vincent.prince.fr@gmail.com>
>>
>> please include a patch description. I.e. this one:
>>
>> -------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8--------
>> There is networking hardware that isn't based on Ethernet for layers 1 and 2.
>>
>> For example CAN.
>>
>> CAN is a multi-master serial bus standard for connecting Electronic Control
>> Units [ECUs] also known as nodes. A frame on the CAN bus carries up to 8 bytes
>> of payload. Frame corruption is detected by a CRC. However frame loss due to
>> corruption is possible, but a quite unusual phenomenon.
>>
>> While fq_codel works great for TCP/IP, it doesn't for CAN. There are a lot of
>> legacy protocols on top of CAN, which are not build with flow control or high
>> CAN frame drop rates in mind.
>>
>> When using fq_codel, as soon as the queue reaches a certain delay based length,
>> skbs from the head of the queue are silently dropped. Silently meaning that the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> user space using a send() or similar syscall doesn't get an error. However
>> TCP's flow control algorithm will detect dropped packages and adjust the
>> bandwidth accordingly.
> Why not fix fq_codel to return the same errors as other qdisc?
The head drop is the problem. After a send() system call returned to
user space, one would not expect that a later send() will knock an
earlier from the queue.
It's too late to throttle the package generation, as one frame is lost
already.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-27 16:56 [RFC] net: sch_generic: fq_codel vs pfifo_fast Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-03-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: sch_generic: add flag IFF_FIFO_QUEUE to use pfifo_fast as default scheduler Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-03-27 17:14 ` Cong Wang
2019-03-27 20:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-03-27 20:53 ` Cong Wang
2019-04-02 17:22 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-27 18:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-03-27 19:27 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-03-27 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] can: dev: let all CAN devices " Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-03-27 18:30 ` [RFC] net: sch_generic: fq_codel vs pfifo_fast Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-27 19:24 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-10-22 12:47 ` [PATCH] net: sch_generic: Use pfifo_fast as fallback scheduler for CAN hardware Vincent Prince
2019-10-22 12:58 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-10-22 13:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Vincent Prince
2019-10-22 14:53 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-10-22 14:55 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-10-22 16:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-22 16:48 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2019-10-22 17:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-10-22 18:21 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2019-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Vincent Prince
2019-10-23 10:52 ` [PATCH v4] " Vincent Prince
2019-10-23 11:13 ` Dave Taht
2019-10-23 13:44 ` [PATCH v5] " Vincent Prince
2019-10-26 2:20 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0d865bd-7bc7-abb5-2b54-2c100c4b9a09@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vincent.prince.fr@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).