netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: olteanv@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andriin@fb.com, edumazet@google.com, weiwan@google.com,
	cong.wang@bytedance.com, ap420073@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxarm@openeuler.org, mkl@pengutronix.de,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, andrii@kernel.org,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, jonas.bonn@netrounds.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	mzhivich@akamai.com, johunt@akamai.com, albcamus@gmail.com,
	kehuan.feng@gmail.com, a.fatoum@pengutronix.de,
	atenart@kernel.org, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
	Jiri Kosina <JKosina@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: sched: fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 07:31:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb0e44fe-bbe0-75ba-fd16-cbf4638e1c0d@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1616641991-14847-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3828 bytes --]

On 25.03.21 04:13, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Lockless qdisc has below concurrent problem:
>      cpu0                 cpu1
>       .                     .
> q->enqueue                 .
>       .                     .
> qdisc_run_begin()          .
>       .                     .
> dequeue_skb()              .
>       .                     .
> sch_direct_xmit()          .
>       .                     .
>       .                q->enqueue
>       .             qdisc_run_begin()
>       .            return and do nothing
>       .                     .
> qdisc_run_end()            .
> 
> cpu1 enqueue a skb without calling __qdisc_run() because cpu0
> has not released the lock yet and spin_trylock() return false
> for cpu1 in qdisc_run_begin(), and cpu0 do not see the skb
> enqueued by cpu1 when calling dequeue_skb() because cpu1 may
> enqueue the skb after cpu0 calling dequeue_skb() and before
> cpu0 calling qdisc_run_end().
> 
> Lockless qdisc has below another concurrent problem when
> tx_action is involved:
> 
> cpu0(serving tx_action)     cpu1             cpu2
>            .                   .                .
>            .              q->enqueue            .
>            .            qdisc_run_begin()       .
>            .              dequeue_skb()         .
>            .                   .            q->enqueue
>            .                   .                .
>            .             sch_direct_xmit()      .
>            .                   .         qdisc_run_begin()
>            .                   .       return and do nothing
>            .                   .                .
>   clear __QDISC_STATE_SCHED    .                .
>   qdisc_run_begin()            .                .
>   return and do nothing        .                .
>            .                   .                .
>            .            qdisc_run_end()         .
> 
> This patch fixes the above data race by:
> 1. Get the flag before doing spin_trylock().
> 2. If the first spin_trylock() return false and the flag is not
>     set before the first spin_trylock(), Set the flag and retry
>     another spin_trylock() in case other CPU may not see the new
>     flag after it releases the lock.
> 3. reschedule if the flags is set after the lock is released
>     at the end of qdisc_run_end().
> 
> For tx_action case, the flags is also set when cpu1 is at the
> end if qdisc_run_end(), so tx_action will be rescheduled
> again to dequeue the skb enqueued by cpu2.
> 
> Only clear the flag before retrying a dequeuing when dequeuing
> returns NULL in order to reduce the overhead of the above double
> spin_trylock() and __netif_schedule() calling.
> 
> The performance impact of this patch, tested using pktgen and
> dummy netdev with pfifo_fast qdisc attached:
> 
>   threads  without+this_patch   with+this_patch      delta
>      1        2.61Mpps            2.60Mpps           -0.3%
>      2        3.97Mpps            3.82Mpps           -3.7%
>      4        5.62Mpps            5.59Mpps           -0.5%
>      8        2.78Mpps            2.77Mpps           -0.3%
>     16        2.22Mpps            2.22Mpps           -0.0%
> 
> Fixes: 6b3ba9146fe6 ("net: sched: allow qdiscs to handle locking")
> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>

I have a setup which is able to reproduce the issue quite reliably:

In a Xen guest I'm mounting 8 NFS shares and run sysbench fileio on
each of them. The average latency reported by sysbench is well below
1 msec, but at least once per hour I get latencies in the minute
range.

With this patch I don't see these high latencies any longer (test
is running for more than 20 hours now).

So you can add my:

Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3135 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-25  3:13 [PATCH net v3] net: sched: fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-09  5:31 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2021-04-12  1:04   ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-12  8:21     ` Juergen Gross
     [not found] ` <20210409090909.1767-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-12  1:24   ` Yunsheng Lin
     [not found]   ` <20210412032111.1887-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-12  3:37     ` Yunsheng Lin
     [not found]     ` <20210412072856.2046-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-12 12:00       ` Yunsheng Lin
     [not found]       ` <20210413022129.2203-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-13  2:56         ` Yunsheng Lin
     [not found]         ` <20210413032620.2259-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-13  3:34           ` Yunsheng Lin
     [not found]           ` <20210413071241.2325-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-13  7:57             ` Yunsheng Lin
     [not found]             ` <20210413083352.2424-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2021-04-13  9:03               ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-13  9:15                 ` Juergen Gross
2021-04-16 11:46                   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-04-18 22:59 ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-19  2:04   ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-19 12:21     ` [Linuxarm] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-04-19 15:25       ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-19 14:57     ` Michal Kubecek
2021-04-20  1:45       ` Yunsheng Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb0e44fe-bbe0-75ba-fd16-cbf4638e1c0d@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=JKosina@suse.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=albcamus@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=jonas.bonn@netrounds.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kehuan.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=mzhivich@akamai.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).