From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Cc: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:55:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef775724-b5fb-ca70-ed2f-f23d8fbf4cd8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210224014700-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 2021/2/24 2:47 下午, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 08:45:20AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:17:58AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:20:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> On 2021/2/24 3:35 上午, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/23/2021 5:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:03:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2021/2/23 9:12 上午, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/21/2021 11:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:14:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/2/19 7:54 下午, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Commit 452639a64ad8 ("vdpa: make sure set_features is invoked
>>>>>>>>>>> for legacy") made an exception for legacy guests to reset
>>>>>>>>>>> features to 0, when config space is accessed before features
>>>>>>>>>>> are set. We should relieve the verify_min_features() check
>>>>>>>>>>> and allow features reset to 0 for this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's worth noting that not just legacy guests could access
>>>>>>>>>>> config space before features are set. For instance, when
>>>>>>>>>>> feature VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is advertised some modern driver
>>>>>>>>>>> will try to access and validate the MTU present in the config
>>>>>>>>>>> space before virtio features are set.
>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a spec violation:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The following driver-read-only field, mtu only exists if
>>>>>>>>>> VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is
>>>>>>>>>> set.
>>>>>>>>>> This field specifies the maximum MTU for the driver to use.
>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do we really want to workaround this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> And also:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The driver MUST follow this sequence to initialize a device:
>>>>>>>>> 1. Reset the device.
>>>>>>>>> 2. Set the ACKNOWLEDGE status bit: the guest OS has
>>>>>>>>> noticed the device.
>>>>>>>>> 3. Set the DRIVER status bit: the guest OS knows how to drive the
>>>>>>>>> device.
>>>>>>>>> 4. Read device feature bits, and write the subset of feature bits
>>>>>>>>> understood by the OS and driver to the
>>>>>>>>> device. During this step the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write)
>>>>>>>>> the device-specific configuration
>>>>>>>>> fields to check that it can support the device before accepting it.
>>>>>>>>> 5. Set the FEATURES_OK status bit. The driver MUST NOT accept new
>>>>>>>>> feature bits after this step.
>>>>>>>>> 6. Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set:
>>>>>>>>> otherwise, the device does not
>>>>>>>>> support our subset of features and the device is unusable.
>>>>>>>>> 7. Perform device-specific setup, including discovery of virtqueues
>>>>>>>>> for the device, optional per-bus setup,
>>>>>>>>> reading and possibly writing the device’s virtio configuration
>>>>>>>>> space, and population of virtqueues.
>>>>>>>>> 8. Set the DRIVER_OK status bit. At this point the device is “live”.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so accessing config space before FEATURES_OK is a spec
>>>>>>>>> violation, right?
>>>>>>>> It is, but it's not relevant to what this commit tries to address. I
>>>>>>>> thought the legacy guest still needs to be supported.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having said, a separate patch has to be posted to fix the guest driver
>>>>>>>> issue where this discrepancy is introduced to
>>>>>>>> virtnet_validate() (since
>>>>>>>> commit fe36cbe067). But it's not technically related to this patch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Siwei
>>>>>>> I think it's a bug to read config space in validate, we should
>>>>>>> move it to
>>>>>>> virtnet_probe().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> I take it back, reading but not writing seems to be explicitly
>>>>>> allowed by spec.
>>>>>> So our way to detect a legacy guest is bogus, need to think what is
>>>>>> the best way to handle this.
>>>>> Then maybe revert commit fe36cbe067 and friends, and have QEMU detect
>>>>> legacy guest? Supposedly only config space write access needs to be
>>>>> guarded before setting FEATURES_OK.
>>>>
>>>> I agree. My understanding is that all vDPA must be modern device (since
>>>> VIRITO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is mandated) instead of transitional device.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>> Well mlx5 has some code to handle legacy guests ...
>>> Eli, could you comment? Is that support unused right now?
>>>
>> If you mean support for version 1.0, well the knob is there but it's not
>> set in the firmware I use. Note sure if we will support this.
> Hmm you mean it's legacy only right now?
> Well at some point you will want advanced goodies like RSS
> and all that is gated on 1.0 ;)
So if my understanding is correct the device/firmware is legacy but
require VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM semanic? Looks like a spec violation?
Thanks
>
>>>>> -Siwie
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rejecting reset to 0
>>>>>>>>>>> prematurely causes correct MTU and link status unable to load
>>>>>>>>>>> for the very first config space access, rendering issues like
>>>>>>>>>>> guest showing inaccurate MTU value, or failure to reject
>>>>>>>>>>> out-of-range MTU.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for
>>>>>>>>>>> supported mlx5 devices")
>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 15 +--------------
>>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>>>>>>>>> index 7c1f789..540dd67 100644
>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1490,14 +1490,6 @@ static u64
>>>>>>>>>>> mlx5_vdpa_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
>>>>>>>>>>> return mvdev->mlx_features;
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>> -static int verify_min_features(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev,
>>>>>>>>>>> u64 features)
>>>>>>>>>>> -{
>>>>>>>>>>> - if (!(features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)))
>>>>>>>>>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>> -}
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> static int setup_virtqueues(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1558,18 +1550,13 @@ static int
>>>>>>>>>>> mlx5_vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64
>>>>>>>>>>> features)
>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev);
>>>>>>>>>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev);
>>>>>>>>>>> - int err;
>>>>>>>>>>> print_features(mvdev, features, true);
>>>>>>>>>>> - err = verify_min_features(mvdev, features);
>>>>>>>>>>> - if (err)
>>>>>>>>>>> - return err;
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> ndev->mvdev.actual_features = features &
>>>>>>>>>>> ndev->mvdev.mlx_features;
>>>>>>>>>>> ndev->config.mtu = cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev, ndev->mtu);
>>>>>>>>>>> ndev->config.status |= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev,
>>>>>>>>>>> VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
>>>>>>>>>>> - return err;
>>>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>> static void mlx5_vdpa_set_config_cb(struct vdpa_device
>>>>>>>>>>> *vdev, struct vdpa_callback *cb)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-19 11:54 [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-21 14:44 ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-21 21:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-22 6:05 ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-23 9:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 9:48 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 9:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-22 4:14 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-22 7:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 1:12 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-23 2:03 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 13:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 19:35 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-24 3:20 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 5:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 6:02 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 6:45 ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-24 6:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 6:55 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-02-24 7:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 12:40 ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-24 7:17 ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-24 5:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 6:04 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 6:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 6:53 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 7:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <babc654d-8dcd-d8a2-c3b6-d20cc4fc554c@redhat.com>
2021-02-24 8:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 9:30 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-28 21:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01 3:53 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 18:24 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-26 0:56 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-28 21:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01 18:08 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-28 21:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-28 21:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01 3:56 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-02 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-02 10:53 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-11 1:44 ` vdpa legacy guest support (was Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero) Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-12 9:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-13 3:02 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-13 8:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-13 8:57 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-13 10:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-14 1:13 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-14 1:59 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-14 3:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-14 5:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-15 1:05 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-15 2:06 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-15 20:52 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-15 21:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-16 2:01 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-16 2:53 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-16 22:32 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-17 1:57 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-17 2:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-17 2:15 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-16 6:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-16 3:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-12-17 1:08 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-12-17 2:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-22 17:09 ` [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-23 2:03 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 9:46 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 10:17 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 9:40 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 10:04 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2021-02-23 10:31 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 10:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-24 9:29 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-24 11:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-25 4:36 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-25 13:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-25 18:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-26 8:19 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-28 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01 3:51 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-02 12:08 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <5f6972fe-7246-b622-958d-9cab8dd98e21@redhat.com>
2021-03-03 8:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-04 8:24 ` Jason Wang
2021-03-04 13:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-05 3:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-23 12:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef775724-b5fb-ca70-ed2f-f23d8fbf4cd8@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).