netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>, marek@cloudflare.com
Cc: ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SOCKET_FILTER regression - eBPF can't subtract when attached from unprivileged user
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:51:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef8e597a-745b-6355-8814-5b863c95e232@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301113901.29448-1-afabre@cloudflare.com>

On 03/01/2019 12:39 PM, Arthur Fabre wrote:
> I can reproduce this on 4.19.0-3-amd64 both with, and without the JIT enabled.
> 
> Dumping the "root" and "non-root" programs with bpftool,
> the subtraction instructions differ:
> 
> "non-root":
>    0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns#74944
>    1: (bf) r7 = r0
>    2: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns#74944
>    3: (bf) r6 = r0
>    4: (bf) r8 = r6
>    5: (b4) w11 = -1
>    6: (1f) r11 -= r8
>    7: (4f) r11 |= r8
>    8: (87) r11 = -r11
>    9: (c7) r11 s>>= 63
>   10: (5f) r8 &= r11
> 
> "root":
>    0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns#74944
>    1: (bf) r7 = r0
>    2: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns#74944
>    3: (bf) r6 = r0
>    4: (bf) r8 = r6
> 
> The remainder of the instructions are for writing the results in the map,
> and the instructions are identical.
> 
> I believe the extra instructions come from "fixup_bpf_calls" in the verifier:
> 
>     if (isneg)
>         *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, off_reg, -1);
>     *patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit - 1);
>     *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
>     *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
>     *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_AX, 0);
>     *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_AX, 63);
>     if (issrc) {
>         *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_AX,
>                      off_reg);
>         insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_AX;
>     } else {
>         *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, off_reg,
>                      BPF_REG_AX);
>     }
> 
> This was introduced by "bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic"
> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1039606/).
> I don't yet understand what's going on.

Hmm, thanks for the report, I'll take a look right away! There's no map
involved here it seems, so there shouldn't be such fixup.

Cheers,
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-01 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-01  1:06 Marek Majkowski
2019-03-01 11:39 ` Arthur Fabre
2019-03-01 12:51   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2019-03-01 14:04   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-03-01 14:10     ` Marek Majkowski
2019-03-01 14:22       ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef8e597a-745b-6355-8814-5b863c95e232@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=afabre@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: SOCKET_FILTER regression - eBPF can'\''t subtract when attached from unprivileged user' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox