netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>
To: John Hurley <john.hurley@netronome.com>
Cc: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"simon.horman@netronome.com" <simon.horman@netronome.com>,
	"jakub.kicinski@netronome.com" <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	"oss-drivers@netronome.com" <oss-drivers@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: sched: fix tp destroy race conditions in flower
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:18:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vbflfu1olaj.fsf@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570058072-12004-3-git-send-email-john.hurley@netronome.com>


On Thu 03 Oct 2019 at 02:14, John Hurley <john.hurley@netronome.com> wrote:
> Flower has rule HW offload functions available that drivers can choose to
> register for. For the deletion case, these are triggered after filters
> have been removed from lookup tables both at the flower level, and the
> higher cls_api level. With flower running without RTNL locking, this can
> lead to races where HW offload messages get out of order.
>
> Ensure HW offloads stay in line with the kernel tables by triggering
> the sending of messages before the kernel processing is completed. For
> destroyed tcf_protos, do this at the new pre_destroy hook. Similarly, if
> a filter is being added, check that it is not concurrently being deleted
> before offloading to hw, rather than the current approach of offloading,
> then checking and reversing the offload if required.
>
> Fixes: 1d965c4def07 ("Refactor flower classifier to remove dependency on rtnl lock")
> Fixes: 272ffaadeb3e ("net: sched: flower: handle concurrent tcf proto deletion")
> Signed-off-by: John Hurley <john.hurley@netronome.com>
> Reported-by: Louis Peens <louis.peens@netronome.com>
> ---
>  net/sched/cls_flower.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> index 74221e3..3ac47b5 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> @@ -513,13 +513,16 @@ static struct cls_fl_filter *__fl_get(struct cls_fl_head *head, u32 handle)
>  }
>  
>  static int __fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_fl_filter *f,
> -		       bool *last, bool rtnl_held,
> +		       bool *last, bool rtnl_held, bool do_hw,
>  		       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
>  	struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
>  
>  	*last = false;
>  
> +	if (do_hw && !tc_skip_hw(f->flags))
> +		fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, f, rtnl_held, extack);
> +
>  	spin_lock(&tp->lock);
>  	if (f->deleted) {
>  		spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
> @@ -534,8 +537,6 @@ static int __fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_fl_filter *f,
>  	spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
>  
>  	*last = fl_mask_put(head, f->mask);
> -	if (!tc_skip_hw(f->flags))
> -		fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, f, rtnl_held, extack);
>  	tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &f->res);
>  	__fl_put(f);
>  
> @@ -563,7 +564,7 @@ static void fl_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp, bool rtnl_held,
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(mask, next_mask, &head->masks, list) {
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(f, next, &mask->filters, list) {
> -			__fl_delete(tp, f, &last, rtnl_held, extack);
> +			__fl_delete(tp, f, &last, rtnl_held, false, extack);
>  			if (last)
>  				break;
>  		}
> @@ -574,6 +575,19 @@ static void fl_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp, bool rtnl_held,
>  	tcf_queue_work(&head->rwork, fl_destroy_sleepable);
>  }
>  
> +static void fl_pre_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp, bool rtnl_held,
> +			   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
> +	struct fl_flow_mask *mask, *next_mask;
> +	struct cls_fl_filter *f, *next;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(mask, next_mask, &head->masks, list)
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(f, next, &mask->filters, list)
> +			if (!tc_skip_hw(f->flags))
> +				fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, f, rtnl_held, extack);
> +}
> +
>  static void fl_put(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct cls_fl_filter *f = arg;
> @@ -1588,6 +1602,13 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto errout_mask;
>  
> +	spin_lock(&tp->lock);
> +	if (tp->deleting || (fold && fold->deleted)) {
> +		err = -EAGAIN;
> +		goto errout_lock;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
> +

But what if one of these flag are set after this block? It would be
possible to insert dangling filters on tp that is being deleted, or
double list_replace_rcu() and idr replace() if same filter is replaced
concurrently, etc.

>  	if (!tc_skip_hw(fnew->flags)) {
>  		err = fl_hw_replace_filter(tp, fnew, rtnl_held, extack);
>  		if (err)
> @@ -1598,22 +1619,7 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>  		fnew->flags |= TCA_CLS_FLAGS_NOT_IN_HW;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&tp->lock);
> -
> -	/* tp was deleted concurrently. -EAGAIN will cause caller to lookup
> -	 * proto again or create new one, if necessary.
> -	 */
> -	if (tp->deleting) {
> -		err = -EAGAIN;
> -		goto errout_hw;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (fold) {
> -		/* Fold filter was deleted concurrently. Retry lookup. */
> -		if (fold->deleted) {
> -			err = -EAGAIN;
> -			goto errout_hw;
> -		}
> -
>  		fnew->handle = handle;
>  
>  		if (!in_ht) {
> @@ -1624,7 +1630,7 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>  						     &fnew->ht_node,
>  						     params);
>  			if (err)
> -				goto errout_hw;
> +				goto errout_lock;
>  			in_ht = true;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1667,7 +1673,7 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>  					    INT_MAX, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  		}
>  		if (err)
> -			goto errout_hw;
> +			goto errout_lock;
>  
>  		refcount_inc(&fnew->refcnt);
>  		fnew->handle = handle;
> @@ -1683,11 +1689,9 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>  
>  errout_ht:
>  	spin_lock(&tp->lock);
> -errout_hw:
> +errout_lock:
>  	fnew->deleted = true;
>  	spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
> -	if (!tc_skip_hw(fnew->flags))
> -		fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, fnew, rtnl_held, NULL);
>  	if (in_ht)
>  		rhashtable_remove_fast(&fnew->mask->ht, &fnew->ht_node,
>  				       fnew->mask->filter_ht_params);
> @@ -1713,7 +1717,7 @@ static int fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg, bool *last,
>  	bool last_on_mask;
>  	int err = 0;
>  
> -	err = __fl_delete(tp, f, &last_on_mask, rtnl_held, extack);
> +	err = __fl_delete(tp, f, &last_on_mask, rtnl_held, true, extack);
>  	*last = list_empty(&head->masks);
>  	__fl_put(f);
>  
> @@ -2509,6 +2513,7 @@ static struct tcf_proto_ops cls_fl_ops __read_mostly = {
>  	.kind		= "flower",
>  	.classify	= fl_classify,
>  	.init		= fl_init,
> +	.pre_destroy	= fl_pre_destroy,
>  	.destroy	= fl_destroy,
>  	.get		= fl_get,
>  	.put		= fl_put,


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02 23:14 [RFC net-next 0/2] prevent sync issues with hw offload of flower John Hurley
2019-10-02 23:14 ` [RFC net-next 1/2] net: sched: add tp_op for pre_destroy John Hurley
2019-10-02 23:14 ` [RFC net-next 2/2] net: sched: fix tp destroy race conditions in flower John Hurley
2019-10-03 16:18   ` Vlad Buslov [this message]
2019-10-03 16:39     ` John Hurley
2019-10-03 16:26 ` [RFC net-next 0/2] prevent sync issues with hw offload of flower Vlad Buslov
2019-10-03 16:59   ` John Hurley
2019-10-03 17:19     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-10-04 15:39       ` John Hurley
2019-10-04 15:58         ` Vlad Buslov
2019-10-04 16:06           ` John Hurley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vbflfu1olaj.fsf@mellanox.com \
    --to=vladbu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=john.hurley@netronome.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: sched: fix tp destroy race conditions in flower' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).