From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Juergen Gross , Jens Axboe , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kent Overstreet To: Matthew Wilcox Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180612190545.10781-1-willy@infradead.org> (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:05:42 -0700") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Matthew, > Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not > as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a > worthy reduction in lines of code. Since most of the changes are in scsi or target, should I take this series through my tree? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering