From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: [PATCH 13/18] netfilter: fix possible removal of wrong hook Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:02:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1438682568-8346-14-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> References: <1438682568-8346-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1438682568-8346-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org nf_unregister_net_hook() uses the nf_hook_ops fields as tuple to look up for the corresponding hook in the list. However, we may have two hooks with exactly the same configuration. This shouldn't be a problem for nftables since every new chain has an unique priv field set, but this may still cause us problems in the future, so better address this problem now by keeping a reference to the original nf_hook_ops structure to make sure we delete the right hook from nf_unregister_net_hook(). Fixes: 085db2c04557 ("netfilter: Per network namespace netfilter hooks.") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- net/netfilter/core.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c index 12504fbb..0ecb2b5 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c @@ -78,26 +78,27 @@ static struct list_head *find_nf_hook_list(struct net *net, return nf_hook_list; } +struct nf_hook_entry { + const struct nf_hook_ops *orig_ops; + struct nf_hook_ops ops; +}; + int nf_register_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg) { struct list_head *nf_hook_list; - struct nf_hook_ops *elem, *new; + struct nf_hook_entry *entry; + struct nf_hook_ops *elem; - new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!new) + entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!entry) return -ENOMEM; - new->hook = reg->hook; - new->dev = reg->dev; - new->owner = reg->owner; - new->priv = reg->priv; - new->pf = reg->pf; - new->hooknum = reg->hooknum; - new->priority = reg->priority; + entry->orig_ops = reg; + entry->ops = *reg; nf_hook_list = find_nf_hook_list(net, reg); if (!nf_hook_list) { - kfree(new); + kfree(entry); return -ENOENT; } @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ int nf_register_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg) if (reg->priority < elem->priority) break; } - list_add_rcu(&new->list, elem->list.prev); + list_add_rcu(&entry->ops.list, elem->list.prev); mutex_unlock(&nf_hook_mutex); #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS if (reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV && reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_register_net_hook); void nf_unregister_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg) { struct list_head *nf_hook_list; + struct nf_hook_entry *entry; struct nf_hook_ops *elem; nf_hook_list = find_nf_hook_list(net, reg); @@ -130,14 +132,9 @@ void nf_unregister_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg) mutex_lock(&nf_hook_mutex); list_for_each_entry(elem, nf_hook_list, list) { - if ((reg->hook == elem->hook) && - (reg->dev == elem->dev) && - (reg->owner == elem->owner) && - (reg->priv == elem->priv) && - (reg->pf == elem->pf) && - (reg->hooknum == elem->hooknum) && - (reg->priority == elem->priority)) { - list_del_rcu(&elem->list); + entry = container_of(elem, struct nf_hook_entry, ops); + if (entry->orig_ops == reg) { + list_del_rcu(&entry->ops.list); break; } } @@ -154,8 +151,8 @@ void nf_unregister_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg) static_key_slow_dec(&nf_hooks_needed[reg->pf][reg->hooknum]); #endif synchronize_net(); - nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(net, elem); - kfree(elem); + nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(net, &entry->ops); + kfree(entry); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_unregister_net_hook); -- 1.7.10.4