* [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd
@ 2019-08-19 13:22 wenxu
2019-08-26 8:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-09-02 6:14 ` wenxu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: wenxu @ 2019-08-19 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pablo, fw; +Cc: netfilter-devel
From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
The flow_block_ing_cmd() needs to call blocking functions while iterating
block_ing_cb_list, nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd is in the cb_list,
So it is the incorrect rcu case. To fix it just traverse the list under
the commit mutex.
Fixes: 9a32669fecfb ("netfilter: nf_tables_offload: support indr block call")
Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
index b95e27b..5431741 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
@@ -363,11 +363,12 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
const struct nft_table *table;
const struct nft_chain *chain;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
+ mutex_lock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
if (table->family != NFPROTO_NETDEV)
continue;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &table->chains, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
if (nft_is_base_chain(chain)) {
struct nft_base_chain *basechain;
@@ -382,4 +383,5 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
}
}
}
+ mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd
2019-08-19 13:22 [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd wenxu
@ 2019-08-26 8:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-26 13:55 ` wenxu
2019-09-02 6:14 ` wenxu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2019-08-26 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wenxu; +Cc: fw, netfilter-devel
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:22:32PM +0800, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>
> The flow_block_ing_cmd() needs to call blocking functions while iterating
> block_ing_cb_list, nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd is in the cb_list,
> So it is the incorrect rcu case. To fix it just traverse the list under
> the commit mutex.
The flow_indr_block_call() is called from a path that already holds
this lock.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd
2019-08-26 8:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2019-08-26 13:55 ` wenxu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: wenxu @ 2019-08-26 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: fw, netfilter-devel
在 2019/8/26 16:38, Pablo Neira Ayuso 写道:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:22:32PM +0800, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
>> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>>
>> The flow_block_ing_cmd() needs to call blocking functions while iterating
>> block_ing_cb_list, nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd is in the cb_list,
>> So it is the incorrect rcu case. To fix it just traverse the list under
>> the commit mutex.
> The flow_indr_block_call() is called from a path that already holds
> this lock.
The flow_indr_block_call already hodls this lock. But the flow_block_ing_cmd is not called
by flow_indr_block_call. It is called by offloaded driver with unregister event for indr_dev.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd
2019-08-19 13:22 [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd wenxu
2019-08-26 8:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2019-09-02 6:14 ` wenxu
2019-09-02 21:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: wenxu @ 2019-09-02 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pablo, fw; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Hi pablo,
any other questions about this patch?
BR
wenxu
On 8/19/2019 9:22 PM, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>
> The flow_block_ing_cmd() needs to call blocking functions while iterating
> block_ing_cb_list, nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd is in the cb_list,
> So it is the incorrect rcu case. To fix it just traverse the list under
> the commit mutex.
>
> Fixes: 9a32669fecfb ("netfilter: nf_tables_offload: support indr block call")
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> index b95e27b..5431741 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> @@ -363,11 +363,12 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
> const struct nft_table *table;
> const struct nft_chain *chain;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
> + mutex_lock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(table, &net->nft.tables, list) {
> if (table->family != NFPROTO_NETDEV)
> continue;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &table->chains, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
> if (nft_is_base_chain(chain)) {
> struct nft_base_chain *basechain;
>
> @@ -382,4 +383,5 @@ void nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
> }
> }
> }
> + mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd
2019-09-02 6:14 ` wenxu
@ 2019-09-02 21:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2019-09-02 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wenxu; +Cc: fw, netfilter-devel
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 02:14:54PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
> Hi pablo,
>
> any other questions about this patch?
Please, rebase:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156728/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1156729/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-02 21:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-19 13:22 [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nf_table_offload: Fix the incorrect rcu usage in nft_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd wenxu
2019-08-26 8:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-26 13:55 ` wenxu
2019-09-02 6:14 ` wenxu
2019-09-02 21:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).