netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Praveen Chaudhary <praveen5582@gmail.com>
To: fw@strlen.de, pablo@netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	kadlec@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zhenggen Xu <zxu@linkedin.com>, Andy Stracner <astracner@linkedin.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] [net]: Fix skb->csum update in inet_proto_csum_replace16().
Date: Wed,  6 Nov 2019 14:52:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1573080729-3102-2-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573080729-3102-1-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com>

skb->csum is updated incorrectly, when manipulation for NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC\DST
is done on IPV6 packet.

Fix:
No need to update skb->csum in function inet_proto_csum_replace16(), even if
skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, because change in L4 header checksum field
and change in IPV6 header cancels each other for skb->csum calculation.

Signed-off-by: Praveen Chaudhary <pchaudhary@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <zxu@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Stracner <astracner@linkedin.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
Changes in V2.
1.) Updating diff as per email discussion with Florian Westphal.
    Since inet_proto_csum_replace16() does incorrect calculation
    for skb->csum in all cases.
2.) Change in Commmit logs.
---

---
Changes in V3.
Addressing Pablo`s Suggesion.
1.) Updated Subject and description
2.) Added full documentation of function.
---
---
 net/core/utils.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/utils.c b/net/core/utils.c
index 6b6e51d..af3b5cb 100644
--- a/net/core/utils.c
+++ b/net/core/utils.c
@@ -438,6 +438,21 @@ void inet_proto_csum_replace4(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_proto_csum_replace4);
 
+/**
+ * inet_proto_csum_replace16 - update L4 header checksum field as per the
+ * update in IPv6 Header. Note, there is no need to update skb->csum in this
+ * function, even if skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, because change in L4
+ * header checksum field and change in IPV6 header cancels each other for
+ * skb->csum calculation.
+ *
+ * @sum: L4 header checksum field
+ * @skb: sk_buff for the packet
+ * @from: old IPv6 address
+ * @to: new IPv6 address
+ * @pseudohdr: True if L4 header checksum includes pseudoheader
+ *
+ * Return void
+ */
 void inet_proto_csum_replace16(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			       const __be32 *from, const __be32 *to,
 			       bool pseudohdr)
@@ -449,9 +464,6 @@ void inet_proto_csum_replace16(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
 		*sum = csum_fold(csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
 				 ~csum_unfold(*sum)));
-		if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE && pseudohdr)
-			skb->csum = ~csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
-						  ~skb->csum);
 	} else if (pseudohdr)
 		*sum = ~csum_fold(csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
 				  csum_unfold(*sum)));
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-06 22:52 [PATCH v3] [net]: Fix skb->csum update in inet_proto_csum_replace16() Praveen Chaudhary
2019-11-06 22:52 ` Praveen Chaudhary [this message]
2020-01-22 10:17   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-01-22 11:43     ` Florian Westphal
2020-01-22 16:22       ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-01-23  8:21         ` Florian Westphal
2020-01-23 14:20           ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-01-23 14:29             ` Florian Westphal
2020-01-23 20:33               ` [PATCH v4] " Praveen Chaudhary
2020-01-23 20:33                 ` Praveen Chaudhary
2020-01-24 19:04                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-01-23 20:50               ` [PATCH v3] " Praveen Chaudhary
2020-01-22  5:51 ` Praveen Chaudhary

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1573080729-3102-2-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com \
    --to=praveen5582@gmail.com \
    --cc=astracner@linkedin.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=zxu@linkedin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).