netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: fw@strlen.de, phil@nwl.cc
Subject: [PATCH iptables RFC 0/4] revisit RESTART log
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:41:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520144115.29732-1-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)

This still does not work, still searching for more bugs here.

Patch 1) Remove skip logic from __nft_table_flush(), before we
	 hit ERESTART. Better do not preventively skip table flush.

Patch 2) Keeps the original cache, while we introduce a new cache
         that is used when we hit ERESTART.

Patch 3) Remove NFT_COMPAT_TABLE_ADD case from refresh transaction,
         I don't find a scenario for this.

Patch 4) Reevaluate based on the existing cache, not on the previous
         object state. Original commit doesn't mention, but
	 NFT_COMPAT_CHAIN_USER_ADD only makes sense to me to do
	 the special handling from h->noflush.

I can still see the test still fails most of the time with:

line 5: CHAIN_USER_ADD failed (File exists): chain UC-0

which should not happen if table exists, because a flush should have
happened before.

Pablo Neira Ayuso (4):
  nft: don't check for table existence from __nft_table_flush()
  nft: keep original cache in case of ERESTART
  nft: don't skip table addition from ERESTART
  nft: don't care about previous state in RESTART

 iptables/nft.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 iptables/nft.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-05-20 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20 14:41 Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2019-05-20 14:41 ` [PATCH iptables RFC 1/4] nft: don't check for table existence from __nft_table_flush() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-20 14:41 ` [PATCH iptables RFC 2/4] nft: keep original cache in case of ERESTART Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-20 14:41 ` [PATCH iptables RFC 3/4] nft: don't skip table addition from ERESTART Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-20 14:41 ` [PATCH iptables RFC 4/4] nft: don't care about previous state in RESTART Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-20 14:49   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-20 14:59     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-20 15:06     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-20 15:12       ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190520144115.29732-1-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).