From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA79C433FF for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3F1206A2 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731050AbfG3O44 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:56 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([193.142.43.52]:43022 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727129AbfG3O44 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:56:56 -0400 Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hsTYc-0004d1-WD; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:56:55 +0200 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:56:54 +0200 From: Florian Westphal To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, bmastbergen@untangle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH nft,RFC,PoC 2/2] src: restore typeof datatype when listing set definition Message-ID: <20190730145654.q5ufyf75xrnfsh73@breakpoint.cc> References: <20190730141620.2129-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20190730141620.2129-3-pablo@netfilter.org> <20190730144141.k3dn37nlychhjk46@breakpoint.cc> <20190730144809.trhyxhhhxegoe47s@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190730144809.trhyxhhhxegoe47s@salvia> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Just make sure there's sufficient context around to rebuild the > expression. Think of more complex fields that require bitmask > operations. Indeed, I had forgotten about those. I agree that this should work as well.