From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ACDC3A5A8 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4D020820 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:08:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567613309; bh=uzKKD5qqt73DIpkrsgYADca5BmE3oK1MNkTTEMz098g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=mW1xkfCbvJVhIVCBWk9JmnFVYZw9qcftCYCCSuiX1Z1W9THVnOHsz3/aS0FLJTbHE fefvY/Ijeso92P7AeeZwYOs1u5JHZ7IwAu1IrAKcgpJi8rc5ahbE+HJSxurjbx/7M3 3/5ME/w9KIG+xj9br0+tFCG4PqVrrzQrV8PxGz4c= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733105AbfIDQIY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:08:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36986 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733016AbfIDQBd (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:01:33 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 627AA22CF5; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:01:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567612892; bh=uzKKD5qqt73DIpkrsgYADca5BmE3oK1MNkTTEMz098g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wxhdMjIMitn1O3HHD5Z6UO/OIrZi9KJ6YP+nKr3EqCGZiIbR1x6ppswPJURIHkZni yidbNkNe0bXOI4zlQoUma/EwA/hc9HB5aRcF52FzJCE4cZnQI4mg7Nwul9AzJz555f Rsimr1mzEzLUH4VzB7SondFnR1hGldZoILjqLRmE= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Juliana Rodrigueiro , Florian Westphal , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Sasha Levin , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 08/36] netfilter: xt_nfacct: Fix alignment mismatch in xt_nfacct_match_info Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:00:54 -0400 Message-Id: <20190904160122.4179-8-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190904160122.4179-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190904160122.4179-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org From: Juliana Rodrigueiro [ Upstream commit 89a26cd4b501e9511d3cd3d22327fc76a75a38b3 ] When running a 64-bit kernel with a 32-bit iptables binary, the size of the xt_nfacct_match_info struct diverges. kernel: sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info) : 40 iptables: sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info)) : 36 Trying to append nfacct related rules results in an unhelpful message. Although it is suggested to look for more information in dmesg, nothing can be found there. # iptables -A -m nfacct --nfacct-name iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information. This patch fixes the memory misalignment by enforcing 8-byte alignment within the struct's first revision. This solution is often used in many other uapi netfilter headers. Signed-off-by: Juliana Rodrigueiro Acked-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h | 5 ++++ net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h index 5c8a4d760ee34..b5123ab8d54a8 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h @@ -11,4 +11,9 @@ struct xt_nfacct_match_info { struct nf_acct *nfacct; }; +struct xt_nfacct_match_info_v1 { + char name[NFACCT_NAME_MAX]; + struct nf_acct *nfacct __attribute__((aligned(8))); +}; + #endif /* _XT_NFACCT_MATCH_H */ diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c b/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c index 6f92d25590a85..ea447b437f122 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c @@ -55,25 +55,39 @@ nfacct_mt_destroy(const struct xt_mtdtor_param *par) nfnl_acct_put(info->nfacct); } -static struct xt_match nfacct_mt_reg __read_mostly = { - .name = "nfacct", - .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC, - .checkentry = nfacct_mt_checkentry, - .match = nfacct_mt, - .destroy = nfacct_mt_destroy, - .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info), - .usersize = offsetof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info, nfacct), - .me = THIS_MODULE, +static struct xt_match nfacct_mt_reg[] __read_mostly = { + { + .name = "nfacct", + .revision = 0, + .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC, + .checkentry = nfacct_mt_checkentry, + .match = nfacct_mt, + .destroy = nfacct_mt_destroy, + .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info), + .usersize = offsetof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info, nfacct), + .me = THIS_MODULE, + }, + { + .name = "nfacct", + .revision = 1, + .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC, + .checkentry = nfacct_mt_checkentry, + .match = nfacct_mt, + .destroy = nfacct_mt_destroy, + .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info_v1), + .usersize = offsetof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info_v1, nfacct), + .me = THIS_MODULE, + }, }; static int __init nfacct_mt_init(void) { - return xt_register_match(&nfacct_mt_reg); + return xt_register_matches(nfacct_mt_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(nfacct_mt_reg)); } static void __exit nfacct_mt_exit(void) { - xt_unregister_match(&nfacct_mt_reg); + xt_unregister_matches(nfacct_mt_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(nfacct_mt_reg)); } module_init(nfacct_mt_init); -- 2.20.1