From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79693C43331 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293EA20825 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731631AbfIEQOA (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:14:00 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:32967 "EHLO relay7-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727014AbfIEQN7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:13:59 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 24.35.62.146 Received: from roberto (c-24-35-62-146.customer.broadstripe.net [24.35.62.146]) (Authenticated sender: eric@garver.life) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 469E920008; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:13:54 -0400 From: Eric Garver To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] tests: shell: check that rule add with index works with echo Message-ID: <20190905161354.3lqlvvhajzhdoaiy@roberto> Mail-Followup-To: Eric Garver , Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190903232713.14394-1-eric@garver.life> <20190905155418.z2lpiet466ceixjy@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190905155418.z2lpiet466ceixjy@salvia> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:54:18PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 07:27:13PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote: > > If --echo is used the rule cache will not be populated. This causes > > rules added using the "index" keyword to be simply appended to the > > chain. The bug was introduced in commit 3ab02db5f836 ("cache: add > > NFT_CACHE_UPDATE and NFT_CACHE_FLUSHED flags"). > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Garver > > --- > > I think the issue is in cache_evaluate(). It sets the flags to > > NFT_CACHE_FULL and then bails early, but I'm not sure of the best way to > > fix it. So I'll start by submitting a test case. :) > > --- > > tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0 | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > .../cache/dumps/0007_echo_cache_init_0.nft | 7 +++++++ > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > create mode 100755 tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0 > > create mode 100644 tests/shell/testcases/cache/dumps/0007_echo_cache_init_0.nft > > > > diff --git a/tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0 b/tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0 > > new file mode 100755 > > index 000000000000..280a0d06bdc3 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/shell/testcases/cache/0007_echo_cache_init_0 > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > > +#!/bin/bash > > + > > +set -e > > + > > +$NFT -i >/dev/null < > +add table inet t > > +add chain inet t c > > +add rule inet t c accept comment "first" > > +add rule inet t c accept comment "third" > > +EOF > > + > > +# make sure the rule cache gets initialized when using echo option > > +# > > +$NFT --echo add rule inet t c index 0 accept comment '"second"' >/dev/null > > Looks like the problem is index == 0? No. The index gets incremented by 1 by the JSON parser (CLI does the same thing). It's never zero if the "index" keyword is used. It's just as easily reproduced if you use any other index. > > if (cmd->handle.index.id || > cmd->handle.position.id) > flags |= NFT_CACHE_RULE | NFT_CACHE_UPDATE; We never reach this code since cache_evaluate() breaks if --echo is used. i.e. evaluate_cache_add() is never called. > We might need to set up a flag, eg. cmd->handle.flags & > NFT_HANDLE_INDEX, similarly with position, given that index.id can be > zero. Alternatively, initialize index id to -1, assuming we'll never > get to ~0U index.