From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDE7C4740A for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5C020872 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731148AbfIJLoN (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 07:44:13 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([193.142.43.52]:42944 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728639AbfIJLoN (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 07:44:13 -0400 Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7eZA-0005zg-Aa; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:44:12 +0200 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:44:12 +0200 From: Florian Westphal To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Garver Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] src: mnl: fix --echo buffer size -- again Message-ID: <20190910114412.GA22704@breakpoint.cc> References: <20190909221918.28473-1-fw@strlen.de> <20190910085056.bfbgsgvhraatmsuc@salvia> <20190910105242.GC2066@breakpoint.cc> <20190910112254.isfbdqjfg6aokcm7@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190910112254.isfbdqjfg6aokcm7@salvia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > I'd still like to keep setting the receive buffer for the non-echo > case, a ruleset with lots of acknowledments (lots of errors) might hit > ENOBUFS, I remember that was reproducible. > > Probably this? it's based on your patch. LGTM, feel free to apply this.