From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C8CA9EAF for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7627205ED for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726088AbfJ3JPZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:15:25 -0400 Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:54042 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726028AbfJ3JPZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:15:25 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2222B1BFA96 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:15:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136E0B7FFB for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:15:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 091ACB8007; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:15:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CD0B7FFE for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:15:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:15:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (sys.soleta.eu [212.170.55.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0735742EE396 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:15:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:15:21 +0100 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Netfilter Development Subject: Re: Documentation question Message-ID: <20191030091521.gosjooprb27xgoc6@salvia> References: <20191030090707.GB6302@dimstar.local.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191030090707.GB6302@dimstar.local.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 08:07:07PM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > When setting verdicts, does sending amended packet contents imply to accept the > packet? In my app I have assumed not and that seems to work fine, but I'd like > to be sure for the doco. If you set the verdict to NF_ACCEPT and the packet that you send back to the kernel is mangled, then the kernel takes your mangled packet contents. Thanks.