netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH nf 0/4] netfilter: conntrack: allow insertion of clashing entries
Date: Mon,  3 Feb 2020 17:37:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200203163707.27254-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)

This series allows conntrack to insert a duplicate conntrack entry
if the reply direction doesn't result in a clash with a different
original connection.

Background:

kubernetes creates load-balancing rules for DNS using
-m statistics, e.g.:
-p udp --dport 53 -m statistics --mode random ... -j DNAT --to-destination x
-p udp --dport 53 -m statistics --mode random ... -j DNAT --to-destination y

When the resolver sends an A and AAAA request back-to-back from
different threads on the same socket, this has a high chance of a connection
tracking clash at insertion time.

This in turn results in a drop of the clashing udp packet which then
results in a 5 second DNS timeout.

The clash cannot be resolved with the current logic because the
two conntracks entries have different NAT transformations, the first one
from s:highport to x.53, the second from s:highport to y.53.

One solution is to change rules to use a consistent mapping, e.g.
using -m cluster or nftables 'jhash' expression.  This would cause
the A and AAAA requests coming from same socket to match the same rule and
thus share the same NAT information.  However, I do not believe this is
a realistic course of action.

This change adds a second clash resolution/drop avoidance step:
A clashing entry will be added anyway provided the reply direction
is unique.

Because this results in duplicate conntrack entries for the original
direction, this comes with strings attached:
1. The clashed entry will only be around for 1 second
2. The clashed entry can only be found in reply direction
   (not inserted for ORIGINAL)
3. The clashed entry is auto-removed once first reply comes in
4  The clashed entry is never assured and can thus be evicted if
   conntrack table becomes full.

Major change since RFC:
1. Do not insert the duplicate/clash in original dir.
2. This implicitly hides the entry from "conntrack -L".
3. use an internal status bit to auto-remove the conntrack
   when first reply comes in.
4. Extend the commit message of last patch to include a
   summary of alternate proposals (and why they did not work out).

I'm sending this for nf rather than nf-next because I consider this
a bug fix, but I am fine if this is deferred for nf-next instead.

Florian Westphal (4):
      netfilter: conntrack: remove two args from resolve_clash
      netfilter: conntrack: place confirm-bit setting in a helper
      netfilter: conntrack: split resolve_clash function
      netfilter: conntrack: allow insertion of clashing entries

 include/linux/rculist_nulls.h                      |   7 +++++
 include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h |  12 ++++++++-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c                  | 192 ++++++++++++++++------
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c             |  20 ++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-03 16:37 Florian Westphal [this message]
2020-02-03 16:37 ` [PATCH nf 1/4] netfilter: conntrack: remove two args from resolve_clash Florian Westphal
2020-02-03 16:37 ` [PATCH nf 2/4] netfilter: conntrack: place confirm-bit setting in a helper Florian Westphal
2020-02-03 16:37 ` [PATCH nf 3/4] netfilter: conntrack: split resolve_clash function Florian Westphal
2020-02-03 16:37 ` [PATCH nf 4/4] netfilter: conntrack: allow insertion of clashing entries Florian Westphal
2020-02-17 19:25 ` [PATCH nf 0/4] " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-02-17 20:12   ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200203163707.27254-1-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).