From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D0CC43331 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152AC206DB for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727769AbgC0RWy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:22:54 -0400 Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:37494 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727705AbgC0RWy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:22:54 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A7DDA704 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91AADA3AB for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id CEB53DA3A1; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2042CDA38D; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03E7842EE393; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:22:50 +0100 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Paul Blakey Cc: Oz Shlomo , Majd Dibbiny , Roi Dayan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] netfilter: flowtable: Use rw sem as flow block lock Message-ID: <20200327172250.q5c6c3xz72hgwteu@salvia> References: <1585300351-15741-1-git-send-email-paulb@mellanox.com> <1585300351-15741-2-git-send-email-paulb@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1585300351-15741-2-git-send-email-paulb@mellanox.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:12:29PM +0300, Paul Blakey wrote: > Currently flow offload threads are synchronized by the flow block mutex. > Use rw lock instead to increase flow insertion (read) concurrency. Applied to nf-next, thanks.