netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: fix infinite loop on rmmod
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 14:28:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200510122807.24011-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)

'rmmod nf_conntrack' can hang forever, because the netns exit
gets stuck in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list():

i_see_dead_people:
 busy = 0;
 list_for_each_entry(net, net_exit_list, exit_list) {
  nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(kill_all, net, 0, 0);
  if (atomic_read(&net->ct.count) != 0)
   busy = 1;
 }
 if (busy) {
  schedule();
  goto i_see_dead_people;
 }

When nf_ct_iterate_cleanup iterates the conntrack table, all nf_conn
structures can be found twice:
once for the original tuple and once for the conntracks reply tuple.

get_next_corpse() only calls the iterator when the entry is
in original direction -- the idea was to avoid unneeded invocations
of the iterator callback.

When support for clashing entries was added, the assumption that
all nf_conn objects are added twice, once in original, once for reply
tuple no longer holds -- NF_CLASH_BIT entries are only added in
the non-clashing reply direction.

Thus, if at least one NF_CLASH entry is in the list then
nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() always skips it completely.

During normal netns destruction, this causes a hang of several
seconds, until the gc worker removes the entry (NF_CLASH entries
always have a 1 second timeout).

But in the rmmod case, the gc worker has already been stopped, so
ct.count never becomes 0.

We can fix this in two ways:

1. Add a second test for CLASH_BIT and call iterator for those
   entries as well, or:
2. Skip the original tuple direction and use the reply tuple.

2) is simpler, so do that.

Fixes: 6a757c07e51f80ac ("netfilter: conntrack: allow insertion of clashing entries")
Reported-by: Chen Yi <yiche@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index c4582eb71766..8cbce1159a91 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -2139,8 +2139,19 @@ get_next_corpse(int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data),
 		nf_conntrack_lock(lockp);
 		if (*bucket < nf_conntrack_htable_size) {
 			hlist_nulls_for_each_entry(h, n, &nf_conntrack_hash[*bucket], hnnode) {
-				if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) != IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL)
+				if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) != IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
 					continue;
+				/* All nf_conn objects are added to hash table twice, one
+				 * for original direction tuple, once for the reply tuple.
+				 *
+				 * Exception: In the IPS_NAT_CLASH case, only the reply
+				 * tuple is added (the original tuple already existed for
+				 * a different object).
+				 *
+				 * We only need to call the iterator once for each
+				 * conntrack, so we just use the 'reply' direction
+				 * tuple while iterating.
+				 */
 				ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
 				if (iter(ct, data))
 					goto found;
-- 
2.26.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-10 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-10 12:28 Florian Westphal [this message]
2020-05-11 17:29 ` [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: fix infinite loop on rmmod Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200510122807.24011-1-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).